Tomorrow, voters in the United States will go to the polls (well those who can, anyway) in an historic Presidential election. It will be historic for a number of reasons, chief among them the fact that the United States will elect its first ever black President in Barack Obama. It is no secret that the vast majority of Canadians prefer the presumptive winner over John McCain. In fact, most Canadians prefer Obama over domestic political leaders (including Prime Minister Harper). It is also no secret that most politically progressive Canadians support Obama over the Republican candidate. So it might come as a surprise that I, a left-leaning Canadian, would not be voting for Obama if I had the opportunity to do so. Don’t get me wrong, I wouldn’t vote for McCain either. I would probably just stay at home or else support a third party candidate.
But, Isn’t Obama Better than McCain?
In my opinion, Barack Obama is a vastly superior candidate to John McCain in terms of public policy and other factors. However, as I have argued in the past, I believe in casting a ballot for a candidate I support rather than voting against a candidate I oppose. And although Obama would be a much better President than John McCain, his policy positions are simply too far from my own values for me to justify hypothetically voting for him.
Obama is perceived as a relatively leftist (or “liberal” to use Americaspeak) candidate. Within the American political culture, this is an accurate description of his politics. However, America has one of the most right-wing political cultures in the world. By comparison, Canada has a political culture that is relatively progressive (if we compare all industrial democracies in the world, Canada is on the centre-right while America is on the far right).
Consider for a moment that Barack Obama is opposed to same sex marriage. The majority of Canadians, including a growing percentage of Conservatives, are supportive of same sex marriage. To oppose same sex marriage rights is considered one of the most socially conservative positions a candidate can take.
Obama is also opposed to universal single-payer health care. Although Obama’s health care reforms would bring down the cost of private insurance, his proposals fall well short of the near-comprehensive public health care systems that are a staple of virtually every other industrial democracy in the world.
Obama has stated that “Jerusalem will remain the capital of Israel, and it must remain undivided”, later clarifying that he meant “a system in which everybody has access to the extraordinary religious sites in Old Jerusalem but that Israel has a legitimate claim on that city”. Of course, any proposal in which a future Palestinian state does not control at least part of the city is a complete non-starter in any Israel-Palestine peace negotiations.
TS and the Vast Socialist Conspiracy framed the socialist perspective on Obama quite eloquently:
The important question to be asked now is just how much change a President Obama will bring. On too much, he is simply a reiteration of the status quo ante in American politics: unqualified support for Israel, opposition to marriage equality, bellicose attitudes toward Cuba and Venezuela, the orthodoxy of capitalism. Not that I expected anything different from him. Let’s face facts. Even a left-wing Democrat would be, at best, a centrist Liberal in Canada. Horatio Alger-ism and class misidentification have produced a phenomenally distorted public perception of class in American society, American society is deeply inculcated with a Pavlovian hostility to socialism, despite the fact that socialism would produce better lives and more true freedom for a great majority of the population. The American political spectrum is so skewed to the right that a depressing number of Americans actually believe that Obama is a socialist. To their credit, many do not, but in a country where “liberal” is a slur (despite the country being deeply liberal in the classical sense), it is hardly surprising that so many react with snarling hostility to the cry of “socialism.”
This more or less sums up the way I feel about Obama. I am delighted that the reign of George W. Bush is coming to an end, and I believe that Americans will be the better for it. But if I were an American, I still would not vote for Barack Obama. He is too far to the poltical right to reflect my political values and ideas. And since I don’t believe in voting for someone simply to prevent an even worse person from winning, I could not vote for Obama in good conscience. I can’t say whether or not I would support a third party candidate; frankly, I don’t know enough about any of them to make that judgment. However, I can say with confidence that if I could vote for Barack Obama tomorrow, I wouldn’t.
I actually heard from someone at the law school yesterday that Obama was too far to the left for them, and this was a relative centrist. I think a lot of his positions have been misconstrued, and maybe have some unrealistic expectations for him.
Obama might be more “Left Libertarian” than most of the other Democratic candidates, but the reality is that the entire American political process largely takes place in the “Right Authoritarian” sphere. The only Democratic nominee in the “Left Libertarian” sphere was Dennis Kucinich, who opposed the War in Iraq and the PATRIOT Act, and even offered reparations for the Iraqi people. However, even Kucinich said that if he was unsuccessful his supporters should back Obama,
This type of coalition building is entirely natural in politics, especially where the same strategy might be shared but the tactics differ. What is perhaps more notable is Obama’s views of Kucinich,
Obama’s platform on a political spectrum in Canada would still be somewhere between the positions of the Liberal and the Green parties, though somewhat more Libertarian than the former and Authoritarian than the latter and more to the Right than both.
What I find interesting is that almost every non-Conservative I know in Canada are in the “Left Libertarian” sphere (you can plot friends who have done the survey), and are usually more Left and Libertarian than any of the political parties (Jacob, strangely, is one of the exceptions). Finding a political party that perfectly matches your personal beliefs completely is not likely to happen for me, and is probably a little unrealistic.
I felt the same way you did during the 2000 election when I was living in the U.S. I then had to live through two terms of a president that was a really bad choice for America and the world, and I think this experience transformed my political perspectives.
I can take the example you use to demonstrate. If McCain was clearly against same-sex marriage but Obama was for it, this single issue might be so important to you that you might be able to give on your other issues to ensure that McCain’s policies don’t rule the day. I don’t think Obama is personally as Right or Authoritarian as his platform is, but he’s probably made some compromises as well understanding the nature of his political constituency. Sometimes it’s better to compromise some of your ideals rather than have to suffer the rule of none of them.
That being said, I actually like the fact that we are not a 2-party system and have some real choice in the process. I just feel a little sorry for the Right because they don’t have the same kind of choices, and are lumped together with some pretty unseeming folks, with serious problems at the highest levels.
This strikes me as completely wrong: Don’t let the perfect be the enemy of the good.
More to come tomorrow when I am less giddy about the Obama victory.