Don’t Do Mandatory Drug Sentences

By: Omar Ha-Redeye · June 5, 2009 · Filed Under Criminal Law, Legal Reform, Politics · 13 Comments

Context is always important in criminal law matters, drug-related crimes especially.

There are a number of reasons why people get involved in drug use and trafficking, including poverty, discrimination, mental illness, depression, chronic pain, sexual abuse, and general desperation.

Although these factors are never an excuse for criminal activity, a judge can take them into consideration in exhibiting some leniency, especially if it is a first time offence or the offender has demonstrated rehabilitation.

Bill C-15, which the House will vote in this week, will establish minimum penalties for drug-related offences by amending the Controlled Drugs and Substances Act.

Janice Tibbetts of The Gazette said,

The bill was lambasted by 13 of the 16 witnesses who appeared before the House of Commons justice committee during public hearings this spring.

Although it’s claimed that it is intended for gang-related activity, the reality is that the amendments will automatically apply to others as well, including general violent offenders, trafficking near schools, or those working with minors.

It’s not that these are commendable actions in any way, but the fact-specific nature of these crimes require review and application by the court, not blanket sentencing devoid of any analysis of the situation in which the offence took place.

The amendments are part of a broader Conservative strategy to get “tough on crime” that simply won’t work.

Perhaps they should consider getting tough on poverty and discrimination first, so they can have the credibility to even begin to address these issues.

Post tags: Bill C-15, Brian Murphy, controlled drugs and substances act, Derek Lee, Janice Tibbetts, Lea Carpenter Brokaw, Michael Savage

Top Twelve Contemporary Hate-Mongers

By: Contributor · October 8, 2008 · Filed Under Civil Rights, Media Law · 5 Comments

Fairness and Accuracy in Reporting (FAIR) have released a report on the top twelve hate-mongers in the American media.

Given the substantial American media content in Canada, there is direct relevance to civil rights here (some of them are even Canadian).

Here’s the list, in no particular order:

It’s a distinction of dubious quality, but one that will go down in history as voices of intolerance and hatred.

One of the report’s authors, Steve Rendell, said,

We found prominent right-wing pundits and activists using misinformation and innuendo to broadcast hate against an entire community… and major media have either fallen asleep at the wheel or, in many cases, have actively helped to spread the smears …We’re talking about double standards.

We’re not talking about people raving on a street corner downtown. These are people who either have a powerful platform at their disposal or are allowed unfettered access to powerful platforms by reporters and editors in what are considered mainstream publications…

Media need to step up and do their job of separating fact from innuendo and can tell the impartial experts apart from the smearcasters.

The entire report can be found here, with case studies available on the new FAIR site dedicated to the subject.

FAIR has made their email address available for comment.