Also in regards to going 50 over it makes absolutely no sense to add that to the Section 172 why not make the fines and penalties of speeding 50 over the limit under section 128 higher or more stringent.

So lets say this person is now after trial convicted of speeding and not stunt driving. The defendant ends up paying fines for the speeding. So what happens to the 7 day suspension that goes on the defendants record for being charged for stunt driving. What happens to the money that the defendant pays to the tow yard… what in the world happened to our constitutional right of “innocent until proven guilty in a court of law”. If some bodies charged and ends of getting a punishment for it whether a fine or a suspension or paying costs or all of the above doesn’t that assume that that person is guilty already and lets say those charges are dismissed why in the world should the abstract of the defended still indicate there was a 7 day suspension and also end up paying for the tow and storage costs.

I apologies for rambling on about this but there is something wrong with our system and how come no body is really doing anything about it to make changes. I am sure people have attempted but there is aught to be something possible.

I attended the Articling & Beyond career fair, where a number of practitioners from smaller communities told me and other students that they wanted to hire new calls and not articling students. Others told us that they were not interested unless we could demonstrate strong ties to their respective families (e.g. family, elementary school, etc.).

Moreover, I know firsthand of students at Osgoode, Queens, and the University of Toronto who have expressed their willingness to go to smaller communities – but are still seeking articling positions.

I just had to change my phone number again..the fear comes because these people have zero boundaries and don’t allow you any so what else will they do? Just this week I’ve had test messages saying how I have some “bad karma” coming to me, how hated I am, etc. etc. and this after my not even talking to this person for eighteen months. This is the second time I’ve had my number changed. He calls old friends of mine, family pretends to be “empathetic” or pitiful and digs info to torment with out of them.

These people are relentless and will go on smear campaigns to ruin you too. It’s just awful to live under something like this. Criminal harrassment, stalking, threats of any kind should be taken very seriously. Maybe there is only physical “violence” one percent of the time but, that does not include the health issues that arise in these situations. I had adrenal failure due to a constant state of fear for two years. Now I’m on meds for that and it’s wrecked havoc with my health in other ways so it is not “just” about the emotional and mental torment. It’s abuse.

Not sure how he pulled you over in his personal car, without lights and stuff.

Most dictionaries I have seen include that usage among others. I must have heard it used hundreds if not thousands of times in that during my 30 years on this earth and this is the first time I’ve ever heard of anyone taking offence to it. Ascribing any ‘insensitivity’ to Davies for this campaign seems unfair given the commonplace colloquial use of the term and the lack of any criticism of that colloquial use. If you really want to delegitimize the use of that term that is fine but you have to at least lay the groundwork for that before you accuse others of insensitivity.

Seems like a tempest in a teapot to me.