<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Law is Cool</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lawiscool.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lawiscool.com</link>
	<description>The law school blog and podcast from Canada</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 14:16:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Lottery Winnings Denied for Being 7 Seconds Late by Joel Ifergan</title>
		<link>http://lawiscool.com/2008/10/09/lottery-winnings-denied-for-being-7-seconds-late/comment-page-1/#comment-20929</link>
		<dc:creator>Joel Ifergan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 14:16:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawiscool.com/?p=934#comment-20929</guid>
		<description>May 14th 2012

6 Day trial is over and we are waiting for the decision of the Superior Court of Quebec.

Joel Ifergan</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>May 14th 2012</p>
<p>6 Day trial is over and we are waiting for the decision of the Superior Court of Quebec.</p>
<p>Joel Ifergan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Federal Court grants Kimberly Rivera a judicial review by Simon W</title>
		<link>http://lawiscool.com/2009/04/21/federal-court-grants-kimberly-rivera-a-judicial-review/comment-page-1/#comment-20910</link>
		<dc:creator>Simon W</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 03:14:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawiscool.com/?p=1562#comment-20910</guid>
		<description>Yes well she&#039;s not going back ANY time soon is she James? And having given Canada a DAUGHTER who IS Canadian? Why SHOULD she? You want cowardice? How about YOU supporting the ILLEGAL war in Iraq &amp; denouncing the cowardice of a woman whose 50 TIMES braver than you &amp; who SERVED OUT THERE!!! YOU sir are the REAL coward Hidden behind your keyboard spouting off - Why don&#039;t YOU face the bombs &amp; bullets &amp; fanatics as SHE did &amp; THEN see if YOU keep courage as you accuse HER of not doing? Idiot - Women are meant to GIVE life NOT take it - It&#039;s unnatural to expect them to do so &amp; if THEY above ALL others? Change their minds on it? That is THEIR perogative &amp; the scum running the US army who effectively bullied her INTO joining the army as a kid &amp; then like the cowards THEY are threatened her kids &amp; husband in their pathetic little tantrum at her doing what was right for HER have NO right to stop her - And after her being in Canada for more than HALF a decade now? Nor WILL they.  To late fool - She&#039;s there to STAY in what is now her HOMEland.  You&#039;ll NEVER get rid of her now &amp; Rightly so.................</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes well she&#8217;s not going back ANY time soon is she James? And having given Canada a DAUGHTER who IS Canadian? Why SHOULD she? You want cowardice? How about YOU supporting the ILLEGAL war in Iraq &amp; denouncing the cowardice of a woman whose 50 TIMES braver than you &amp; who SERVED OUT THERE!!! YOU sir are the REAL coward Hidden behind your keyboard spouting off &#8211; Why don&#8217;t YOU face the bombs &amp; bullets &amp; fanatics as SHE did &amp; THEN see if YOU keep courage as you accuse HER of not doing? Idiot &#8211; Women are meant to GIVE life NOT take it &#8211; It&#8217;s unnatural to expect them to do so &amp; if THEY above ALL others? Change their minds on it? That is THEIR perogative &amp; the scum running the US army who effectively bullied her INTO joining the army as a kid &amp; then like the cowards THEY are threatened her kids &amp; husband in their pathetic little tantrum at her doing what was right for HER have NO right to stop her &#8211; And after her being in Canada for more than HALF a decade now? Nor WILL they.  To late fool &#8211; She&#8217;s there to STAY in what is now her HOMEland.  You&#8217;ll NEVER get rid of her now &amp; Rightly so&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 17 Ridiculous American Laws by Jonathan</title>
		<link>http://lawiscool.com/2010/03/04/17-ridiculous-american-laws/comment-page-1/#comment-20509</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 May 2012 14:37:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawiscool.com/?p=2511#comment-20509</guid>
		<description>There is a great one near me (UK).  All taxi cabs must carry a spare bale of hay. Obviously dates back to horse and cart, but apparently has never been repealed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is a great one near me (UK).  All taxi cabs must carry a spare bale of hay. Obviously dates back to horse and cart, but apparently has never been repealed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Employee Privacy in Canada by Amanda</title>
		<link>http://lawiscool.com/2008/01/02/employee-privacy-in-canada/comment-page-1/#comment-20110</link>
		<dc:creator>Amanda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2012 13:10:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawiscool.com/2008/01/02/employee-privacy-in-canada/#comment-20110</guid>
		<description>I have a co-worker that was terminated employment under &quot;fishy&quot; circumstances. My employer then proceeded to pull each remaining employee (and some clients) into her office to inform us of the termination. Only, instead of just informing all other other employees, she then proceeded to list off all of the reasons why this employee had been terminated (half of which were unfounded reasons). I was just wondering what the privacy laws are regarding the terminated employee - does she have a right to keep the reasons for her termination private? Isn&#039;t this an attack on her reputation and character? thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a co-worker that was terminated employment under &#8220;fishy&#8221; circumstances. My employer then proceeded to pull each remaining employee (and some clients) into her office to inform us of the termination. Only, instead of just informing all other other employees, she then proceeded to list off all of the reasons why this employee had been terminated (half of which were unfounded reasons). I was just wondering what the privacy laws are regarding the terminated employee &#8211; does she have a right to keep the reasons for her termination private? Isn&#8217;t this an attack on her reputation and character? thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The 12 Equitable Maxims by Benson Leslie</title>
		<link>http://lawiscool.com/2007/09/25/the-12-equitable-maxims/comment-page-1/#comment-19831</link>
		<dc:creator>Benson Leslie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2012 18:41:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawiscool.com/2007/09/25/the-12-equitable-maxims/#comment-19831</guid>
		<description>could you please give me explanation on; Equity aids the vigilant not those who slumber on their rights? does this look similar with; Equity will not assist volunteer? thank you..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>could you please give me explanation on; Equity aids the vigilant not those who slumber on their rights? does this look similar with; Equity will not assist volunteer? thank you..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The 12 Equitable Maxims by Pheena Cruickshank</title>
		<link>http://lawiscool.com/2007/09/25/the-12-equitable-maxims/comment-page-1/#comment-19783</link>
		<dc:creator>Pheena Cruickshank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2012 16:30:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawiscool.com/2007/09/25/the-12-equitable-maxims/#comment-19783</guid>
		<description>Could you please supply the definition and defining case for each of the maxims?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Could you please supply the definition and defining case for each of the maxims?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Rule of Law in Canada by Jeanne Sarson</title>
		<link>http://lawiscool.com/2007/10/12/rule-of-law-in-canada/comment-page-1/#comment-19765</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeanne Sarson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2012 12:03:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawiscool.com/2007/10/12/rule-of-law-in-canada/#comment-19765</guid>
		<description>As an activist and human right defender of Canadian and non-Canadian persons who have suffered non-state actor torture, part of this work is focussed on the necessity for an amendment to the Criminal Code of Canada. Presently, only State actors--the police or military for example--can be held accountable for acts that constitute torture. Non-state actors have impunity because even though they commit the same acts of &#039;classic&#039; torture they are not held equally legally accountable. I see the application of the &#039;rule of law&#039; as containing dual discriminatory processes. First, victims of non-state torture cannot charge for the crime of torture suffered and there is a gender bias present in that sexualized torture is predominately inflicted against women/girls. Secondly, there is not equal legal accountability in that the law differentiates between State versus non-state actors. Both ought to be equally accountable under the rule of law.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As an activist and human right defender of Canadian and non-Canadian persons who have suffered non-state actor torture, part of this work is focussed on the necessity for an amendment to the Criminal Code of Canada. Presently, only State actors&#8211;the police or military for example&#8211;can be held accountable for acts that constitute torture. Non-state actors have impunity because even though they commit the same acts of &#8216;classic&#8217; torture they are not held equally legally accountable. I see the application of the &#8216;rule of law&#8217; as containing dual discriminatory processes. First, victims of non-state torture cannot charge for the crime of torture suffered and there is a gender bias present in that sexualized torture is predominately inflicted against women/girls. Secondly, there is not equal legal accountability in that the law differentiates between State versus non-state actors. Both ought to be equally accountable under the rule of law.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Ron Paul&#8217;s Liberty by DoubleD</title>
		<link>http://lawiscool.com/2012/02/21/ron-pauls-liberty/comment-page-1/#comment-19728</link>
		<dc:creator>DoubleD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Apr 2012 01:11:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawiscool.com/?p=3332#comment-19728</guid>
		<description>The second clause is not &quot;an estate tax&quot; as the image is intending, ie. the implementation of one. This sort of thing already existed at that time in one form or another (the text of the charter refers to &quot;ancient relief&quot;). The second clause of Magna Carta is intended to impose a restriction on such taxes as they were considered unjust.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The second clause is not &#8220;an estate tax&#8221; as the image is intending, ie. the implementation of one. This sort of thing already existed at that time in one form or another (the text of the charter refers to &#8220;ancient relief&#8221;). The second clause of Magna Carta is intended to impose a restriction on such taxes as they were considered unjust.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Conflicted Relationship between Lawyers and &#8220;Indians&#8221; by John John</title>
		<link>http://lawiscool.com/2009/01/11/the-conflicted-relationship-between-lawyers-and-indians/comment-page-1/#comment-19691</link>
		<dc:creator>John John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2012 07:31:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawiscool.com/?p=1264#comment-19691</guid>
		<description>For those interested in more about this genuine Canadian dissident and his work, please visit his blog:

mightisnotright.org/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For those interested in more about this genuine Canadian dissident and his work, please visit his blog:</p>
<p>mightisnotright.org/</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on B&amp;E or Homicide?  Choose Quick! by business seo</title>
		<link>http://lawiscool.com/2009/05/21/be-or-homicide-choose-quick/comment-page-1/#comment-19690</link>
		<dc:creator>business seo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2012 06:42:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawiscool.com/?p=1599#comment-19690</guid>
		<description>My husband and i have been really contented  Michael managed to finish up his researching using the ideas he had when using the blog. It is now and again perplexing to simply happen to be freely giving tactics which others have been trying to sell. And now we keep in mind we now have the writer to appreciate because of that. These explanations you have made, the simple blog navigation, the friendships you will give support to instill - its got mostly sensational, and its really letting our son in addition to us understand this content is cool, and that is unbelievably pressing. Thank you for all!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My husband and i have been really contented  Michael managed to finish up his researching using the ideas he had when using the blog. It is now and again perplexing to simply happen to be freely giving tactics which others have been trying to sell. And now we keep in mind we now have the writer to appreciate because of that. These explanations you have made, the simple blog navigation, the friendships you will give support to instill &#8211; its got mostly sensational, and its really letting our son in addition to us understand this content is cool, and that is unbelievably pressing. Thank you for all!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 0.294 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2012-05-24 20:56:04 -->
<!-- Compression = gzip -->
