Look, It’s a Mammoth Erection!

Mammoth Erection v. Vann Niagara Ltd., [2007] O.J. No. 2153, 64 C.L.R. (3d) 104, 157 A.C.W.S. (3d) 940 (Ont. S.C.J.)

A classic, by Law is Cool founder Omar Ha-Redeye, who detailed it years ago on Slaw.

Comments

• Disclaimer

  Law Is Cool is an open forum for ideas, intended to stimulate discussion. The views expressed in posts and comments are those of the individual contributor and may not be reflective of the views of other authors or readers.

  
  

  The contents of this site are intended for educational purposes only and must not be construed as legal advice.

  
  

  We encourage everyone requiring legal advice to consult with a licensed lawyer.

• Pages

  • About Law is Cool
  • Summaries Collection

• Latest Posts

  • Chess Master, You May Approach the Bench
  • Go Home? Unlikely
  • Corporations as People, Owning People
  • Lake Superior State Unicorn Hunting Regulations
  • Law Student Booted Off the Bachelor
  • Law School Husslin – Part 3
  • LSUC Publishes Articling Task Force Report
  • Kentucky Judge Roasts Lawyer in Court – And on Tape
  • Jon Stewart on Strip Searches

• Latest Comments

  • Darryl Wesley on Parole Denied for Homolka Pen-Pal
  • Pro on Lord of the Rings as Property Law
  • student on The 12 Equitable Maxims
  • Mike on Problems with New Impaired Driving Legislation
  • Motya on Student-teacher love can be a serious crime in Canada
  • Ashley Casas on Law Student Booted Off the Bachelor
  • Sam on Advice for Incoming Mature Law Students
  • Omotoyosi Ezra on Does International Law Even Exist?
  • very confused on Why You Should Never Talk to the Police
  • UO Grad on LSUC Publishes Articling Task Force Report

• Post Categories

  • Aboriginal Law
  • Administrative
  • Administrative Law
  • ADR/Mediation
  • Bankrupcy & Insolvency
  • Blogroll
  • Civil Procedure
  • Civil Rights
  • Class Action
  • Constitutional Law
  • Construction Law
  • Contracts
  • Corporate Law
  • Criminal Law
  • Diversity in Law
  • Entertainment Law
  • Environmental Law
  • Ethics
  • Evidence
  • Family Law
  • Health Law
  • Humour
  • Immigration Law
  • Intellectual Property
  • International Law
  • Labour & Employment Law
  • Law Career
  • Law Foundations
  • Law School
  • Law School Tips
  • Legal Reform
  • Legal Research
  • Marketing/PR in Law
  • Media Law
  • Podcasts
  • Politics
  • Pop Culture
  • Privacy
  • Privacy Law
  • Pro Bono
  • Property
  • Public Interest
  • Regulatory Law
  • Reviews
  • Securities Law
  • Tax Law
  • Technology
  • Torts
  • Trusts/Estates
  • Uncategorized

Awards

Partners

• sLaw

  • Third Time IS a Charm – Ryan Manilla Passes the Good Character Requirement
  • Tips Tuesday
  • Point and Touch

• The Court

  • BULLETIN: Text Messages are “Private Communications” in R v Telus Communications Co.
  • Supreme Court of Canada Expands on the Honour of the Crown in Manitoba Métis Federation Inc. v Canada (Attorney General)
  • Amici Curiae: OCA Says “Hell’s Yes, Maybe” and a Canadian Mining Industry Update

• UofT

  • An error has occurred, which probably means the feed is down. Try again later.

• UofC

  • Intersection Between Different Legal Areas
  • Do Covenants to Compensate for Designation as an Historical Resource Run with the Land?
  • The Role of the “Noble Savage” in Environmental Social Activism

• UofA

  • Harvard and Academic Freedom
  • 400 parts per million, or why we're totally F*#%#$
  • May 2013 Issue of the Toronto Law Journal is Online

• LexMonitor

  • The Impeachment: Should Chief Justice Renato Corona Testify in his Defense?
  • Ind. Gov't. - As if to show that fears of state government sites going down are real
  • Utah Bill Becomes Law: 72-Hour Wait For Abortion

• Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries RSS
  • Comments RSS
  • WordPress.org