Facebook ‘Friend Poaching’

When was the last time you sent a friend request on Facebook? When was the last time you got sued for it? Complexions v Complexions Day Spa & Facebook, is, according to Santa Clara Internet Law professor Eric Goldman, the first case to involve Facebook ‘friend poaching‘.

The case is currently in front of the New York Northern District Court, and involves two spas doing business under similar trade names, and Facebook. The plaintiff spa notified Facebook of a trademark infringement, which prompted Facebook to remove the page. For this action, the  plaintiff is seeking damages in lost sales and marketing potential.

The plaintiff is further claiming that the defendant spa knowingly ‘friended’ it’s customers to the defendant spa’s own Facebook page, creating an unfair advantage for the defendant spa. For this, the plaintiff is seeking injunctive relief and monetary damages.

The case is yet to be decided, and according to Goldman, it’s likely to be the first of many such cases. Among the keen to see how this case unfolds is American University blogger, Dana Nicoletti, who notes that “it will be extremely interesting to see how the Northern District of New York treats these contentions, and how other businesses react to a decision.” Whatever the decision,  businesses will have to think twice the next time they so much as log onto Facebook.

About the Author

Zeeshan Baig
Zeeshan Baig is currently based in the UK, where he is completing his second year at the School of Law at the University of Leicester. His focus this year was on Family Law and International Law. He has a background in community advocacy and organization, and an interest in social media and digital design.

1 Comment on "Facebook ‘Friend Poaching’"

  1. David Coleman | March 27, 2011 at 11:10 pm |

    We’ve been looking for some ah, free advise, on how to approach our dealer about our camper trailer. They have been trying to fix an on-going water leak that has plageed this trailer since we purchased it new in 2005. The Lemon Law would be a great advantage for my wife and I if it included RV’s in Canada. We have approached the manufacturer and they stated they were acting on a “good will” gesture and it’s not a mechanical or structural defect. Well, we beleive it’s a defective trailer, otherwise the leak would’ve been fixed the first or second time round. Since we have owned the trailer it has either been returned to the factory or to the dealer for supposed repair during the off-season. Our concern is, do we have a case if we take the manufacturer or dealer to small claims court? Our claim would be for replacement value plus court costs (+$23,000 CDN). Can anyone offer a suggestion at this point?

Comments are closed.