<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: EPA lawyers who criticize cap-and-trade cautioned by EPA over professional ethics</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lawiscool.com/2009/11/11/epa-lawyers-who-criticize-cap-and-trade-cautioned-by-epa-over-professional-ethics/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lawiscool.com/2009/11/11/epa-lawyers-who-criticize-cap-and-trade-cautioned-by-epa-over-professional-ethics/?nucrss=1</link>
	<description>The law school blog and podcast from Canada</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 19:40:14 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Amelio The</title>
		<link>http://lawiscool.com/2009/11/11/epa-lawyers-who-criticize-cap-and-trade-cautioned-by-epa-over-professional-ethics/comment-page-1/#comment-7227</link>
		<dc:creator>Amelio The</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 18:16:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawiscool.com/?p=2231#comment-7227</guid>
		<description>I say that most signs seem to indicate Kerry-Boxer will pass because (unlike previous attempts at cap-and-trade bills) it’s got momentum, it’s got bipartisan support, *and* the composition of the Senate has changed as well. As to the support of people, a recent poll suggests the majority of Americans support it too:

&lt;a href=&quot;http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2009/10/27/cnn-poll-6-in-10-back-cap-and-trade/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;6 in 10 back ‘cap-and-trade’&lt;/a&gt;

Whether it would pass before Copenhagen is another question entirely.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I say that most signs seem to indicate Kerry-Boxer will pass because (unlike previous attempts at cap-and-trade bills) it’s got momentum, it’s got bipartisan support, *and* the composition of the Senate has changed as well. As to the support of people, a recent poll suggests the majority of Americans support it too:</p>
<p><a href="http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2009/10/27/cnn-poll-6-in-10-back-cap-and-trade/" rel="nofollow">6 in 10 back ‘cap-and-trade’</a></p>
<p>Whether it would pass before Copenhagen is another question entirely.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CC26</title>
		<link>http://lawiscool.com/2009/11/11/epa-lawyers-who-criticize-cap-and-trade-cautioned-by-epa-over-professional-ethics/comment-page-1/#comment-7224</link>
		<dc:creator>CC26</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 13:19:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawiscool.com/?p=2231#comment-7224</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not sure why Amelio seems to think that all signs indicate cap and trade will pass.  That&#039;s sipmly not true.  It is a horribly flawed piece of legislation that will permanently depress the US economy.  A majority of Americans do not support it, and those who want to let their members of Congress know can visit http://tiny.cc/FXGVq.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not sure why Amelio seems to think that all signs indicate cap and trade will pass.  That&#8217;s sipmly not true.  It is a horribly flawed piece of legislation that will permanently depress the US economy.  A majority of Americans do not support it, and those who want to let their members of Congress know can visit <a href="http://tiny.cc/FXGVq" rel="nofollow">http://tiny.cc/FXGVq</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
