<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Toronto Police Accuses SIU of Playing Politics</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lawiscool.com/2009/10/30/toronto-police-accuses-siu-of-playing-politics/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lawiscool.com/2009/10/30/toronto-police-accuses-siu-of-playing-politics/?nucrss=1</link>
	<description>The law school blog and podcast from Canada</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 00:00:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christopher Cronk</title>
		<link>http://lawiscool.com/2009/10/30/toronto-police-accuses-siu-of-playing-politics/comment-page-1/#comment-9897</link>
		<dc:creator>Christopher Cronk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Dec 2010 02:36:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawiscool.com/?p=2188#comment-9897</guid>
		<description>Hi There,

With all the &quot;passing the buck&quot; regarding the conduct by the police during the G20 summit, we are being told that because the officers cannot be identified, prosecution is nearly impossible and has subsequently been dropped.....

It appears to me that if the police are so very adept at using &quot;Facial Recognition Software&quot; to identify perpetrators, then why can&#039;t they use the same software to identify the officers who were over zealous in their performance of their duties....

If nothing more, they would be able to be identified as officers who defied protocol by not wearing proper identification.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi There,</p>
<p>With all the &#8220;passing the buck&#8221; regarding the conduct by the police during the G20 summit, we are being told that because the officers cannot be identified, prosecution is nearly impossible and has subsequently been dropped&#8230;..</p>
<p>It appears to me that if the police are so very adept at using &#8220;Facial Recognition Software&#8221; to identify perpetrators, then why can&#8217;t they use the same software to identify the officers who were over zealous in their performance of their duties&#8230;.</p>
<p>If nothing more, they would be able to be identified as officers who defied protocol by not wearing proper identification.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

