Do you have a right to marry a foreigner?
Not effectively. Not, if you want to stay in your own country, Canada. In that case, marrying a foreigner is a privilege granted by the government. The Star reports today about exorbitant refusal rates for sponsoring spouses from some parts of the world.
Although the initial reaction to this story may be focused on the discrimination, whether you approve it or not, Canadians’ civil rights and access to justice are at stake here. The government has discretion in screening sponsorship applications. It means there is little recourse in rejected cases and the government doesn’t have to give you reasons.
Fair?
(post sponsored by advicescene.com)
Comments
6 Responses to “Do you have a right to marry a foreigner?”
Leave a Reply
Disclaimer
Law Is Cool is an open forum for ideas, intended to stimulate discussion. The views expressed in posts and comments are those of the individual contributor and may not be reflective of the views of other authors or readers.
The contents of this site are intended for educational purposes only and must not be construed as legal advice.
We encourage everyone requiring legal advice to consult with a licensed lawyer.
Pages
-
Latest Posts
- Islamophobia in Canada: A Primer
- Occupy Ties to former Bay Street Lawyer
- Keep it in Perspective
- Discrimination at the University of Ottawa?
- Toronto Mayor Rob Ford Lacked Legal Authority to Cancel Transit City
- Should Representative Plaintiffs Receive More?
- Breach of They Neighbour’s Wife
- Advocates Don’t Dance Alone
- These Days the Slaves Fight Back
Latest Comments
- Ethan on On grandmothers and stunt driving
- KS on LSUC Consultation on Articling
- Shafia honour trial, All the (older) single ladies, Bullying « Anything Anything Anything on About Law is Cool
- Shafia honour trial, All the (older) single ladies, Bullying « Anything Anything Anything on About Law is Cool
- Anne on Profile of a Stalker
- Bob Bennett on Can a police officer still give you a ticket if they’re not wearing their hat?
- KC on These Days the Slaves Fight Back
- KC on Discrimination at the University of Ottawa?
- Mary Puto on Employee Privacy in Canada
- Debbie Adams on Advice for Incoming Mature Law Students
Post Categories
- Aboriginal Law
- Administrative
- Administrative Law
- ADR/Mediation
- Bankrupcy & Insolvency
- Blogroll
- Civil Procedure
- Civil Rights
- Class Action
- Constitutional Law
- Construction Law
- Contracts
- Corporate Law
- Criminal Law
- Diversity in Law
- Entertainment Law
- Environmental Law
- Ethics
- Evidence
- Family Law
- Health Law
- Humour
- Immigration Law
- Intellectual Property
- International Law
- Labour & Employment Law
- Law Career
- Law Foundations
- Law School
- Law School Tips
- Legal Reform
- Legal Research
- Marketing/PR in Law
- Media Law
- Podcasts
- Politics
- Pop Culture
- Privacy
- Privacy Law
- Pro Bono
- Property
- Public Interest
- Regulatory Law
- Reviews
- Securities Law
- Tax Law
- Technology
- Torts
- Trusts/Estates
- Uncategorized
Aboriginal Law
Administrative Law
Class Action Suits
Constitutional Law & Civil Rights
Corporate Law
Criminal Law
Environmental Law
Family Law
Firms
- Back of Envelope blog
- BC Business Law Blog
- BC LawLINE
- bob tarantino
- Business Law Blog
- Canada Immigration
- Canada Immigration Blog
- Canadian Immigration Blawg
- Canadian Privacy Law Blog
- Canadian Securities Law Online
- Canadian Trademark Blog
- Cavanaagh Williams
- Daniel A. Lublin
- Daniel Lublin
- EXCESS COPYRIGHT
- GenereuxLaw
- Hoyes Michalos and Associates
- Injury Law Blog.com
- Law of the Land
- Municipal, Planning & Environmental Law Group Blog
- Now, Why Didn’t I Think of That?
- Osler Audio Reports
- Real Lawyers Have Blogs
- Renewable Energy & Sustainable Development Group Blog
- Robinson Sheppard Shapiro
- Rule of Law
- Schenk & Associates
- Strictly Legal
- Thoughts from a Management Lawyer
- Toronto Estate Law Blog
- Venture Law Lines
Fun & Entertainment
Health Law
Immigration Law
Intellectual Property
International Law
Labour & Employment Law
Labour Law
Law Marketing/PR
Law News
Law School
- Ablawg.ca
- Chaire en droit de la sécurité et des affaires électroniques
- Constantinos Ragas
- Emadi St. Pierre
- Law Enforcement Accountability Project (LEAP)
- Law, Eh? Canadian Law School
- lawstudents.ca
- Legal and Literary Society
- Legal Intellects
- Lisa Hutch – The Trials
- Michael Geist’s Blog
- Michelle’s World
- Motion to Recess
- Non Traditional Law Student
- Outlines
- Privity: Just between You and Me
- The Court
- Trials and Tribulations
- TwistLaw.com
- UBC Law Library Blog
- University of Toronto Law School Faculty Blog
Legal Research
- Ballad in Plain E
- British Columbia Courthouse Library Society
- Connie Crosby
- CultureLibre.ca (French)
- Law21
- Library Boy
- LibTech Life
- Right and Remedies
- Shaunna Mireau on Canadian Legal Research
- Slaw
- Thoughtful Legal Management
- TwistLaw.com
- UBC Law Library Blog
- Vancouver Law Librarian Blog
- Wines and Information Management (WIM) (French)
Personal Injury Law
Podcasts
Politics
Property & Estate Law
Securities Law
Student Blogs
Archives
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007

RSS Feed







![CBA_MasterBrand_Logo[1]](http://lawiscool.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/CBA_MasterBrand_Logo1.jpg)



















Based on the article, the system does appear to be failing with the result that some Canadian citizens are experiencing significant hardship. In a quasi-judicial process that permits appeals, it is my understanding that reasons must be given; and technically, the appeal process is recourse. If the process is slow, complex and opaque, and competent representation is expensive, then justice/fairness is a genuine concern … that’s probably what you mean. Your point is well-taken despite my quibbling with your choice of words (sorry, I couldn’t resist).
Omar,
As you may know, it took nearly 12 months for me to bring my wife over from the Philippines.
My experience with Mississauga CIC, where you make the initial filing was excellent, timely and professional.
The problem is located in the individual embassies or consulates.
Manila CIC was exceptionally incompetent and arrogant, in the handling of my wife’s file. This attitude runs right from the top of Manila CIC downwards. Because, yes, I did deal directly with the individual in charge in Manila CIC – who was unimpressive.
As a lawyer, I was able to complete the excessive amount of forms and collect the mountain of evidence (35 separate envelopes of materials) with only minor difficulties. But, God help the average person in completing this task alone.
Yet, despite my attention to detail, Manila CIC insisted that I was missing forms; until I had to point out why these forms were not needed. Apparently Manila CIC does not read its own instructions.
It seems to me that since embassies and consulates are located away from Canada, far from their superiors, CIC officials in these offices adopt a god-complex. They are the gatekeepers and can do as they please.
And, they are exceptionally risk-averse. As a result, the practice emerges that visas should be denied where there is the slightest hint of irregularity or problem, as it easier to deny, than to undertake a considered and careful examination.
The problem is not so much with the rules – as marriage fraud does take place and many of the questions asked do make sense – but with those who are charged with ensuring compliance.
Thank you for sharing your experiences Mitch. You’re right – if it was that difficult for you, it would be probably much more challenging for others.
No this is not fair, and think it is a breach of human rights. How can the relation between spouses be judged by national borders and parameters?
Fair has little to do with it, thanks to the level’s of corruption and abuse in our immigration system.
There are countless examples’ of marriages of convenience. It should be up to the Government to decide who gets in or not..REGARDLESS of marital status to a Canadian citizen.
It may not be fair to those who have actually fallen in love with those they marry, but the policy really throws a wrench into arranged loveless marriages or marriages meant to circumvent the normal immigration process. If you don’t like it….move to join your wife or husband.
Re: James
I think taking the attitude that Government should decide our faith “REGARDLESS of marital status to a canadian citizen” is of old school and opinions like yours should be abolished! There are steps that the government of Canada can take to prevent fraud marriages. One of the preventions would be to send these people back to their countries. I am not going to get into the symantics of this issue! I will say though that other countries have preventive measures in place to curb marriage fraud. Our government needs to stop putting our tax dollars into a system that allows marriage fraud and other immigration frauds.