<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: More on Abdelrazik</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lawiscool.com/2009/06/15/more-on-abdelrazik/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lawiscool.com/2009/06/15/more-on-abdelrazik/?nucrss=1</link>
	<description>The law school blog and podcast from Canada</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 00:00:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marnie Tunay</title>
		<link>http://lawiscool.com/2009/06/15/more-on-abdelrazik/comment-page-1/#comment-5659</link>
		<dc:creator>Marnie Tunay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 22:29:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawiscool.com/?p=1662#comment-5659</guid>
		<description>Okay, so I&#039;m &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.edmontonjournal.com/news/Feds+agree+bring+Abdelrazik+back+from+Sudan/1709573/story.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;eating my words&lt;/a&gt; on Abdelrazik:


&lt;blockquote&gt;After weeks of pressure by his supporters, the federal government said Thursday it would comply with a court order to bring Abousfian Abdelrazik back to Canada.&lt;/blockquote&gt;



For me, though, that was a win-win wager.  I&#039;m glad that the Privy Council has has the grace to admit that the Arch-Orwellian Big Brother, the U.S. Joint &quot;Anti-Terrorism Task Force&quot; was behind the whole Kafaesque travesty of justice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay, so I&#8217;m <a href="http://www.edmontonjournal.com/news/Feds+agree+bring+Abdelrazik+back+from+Sudan/1709573/story.html" rel="nofollow">eating my words</a> on Abdelrazik:</p>
<blockquote><p>After weeks of pressure by his supporters, the federal government said Thursday it would comply with a court order to bring Abousfian Abdelrazik back to Canada.</p></blockquote>
<p>For me, though, that was a win-win wager.  I&#8217;m glad that the Privy Council has has the grace to admit that the Arch-Orwellian Big Brother, the U.S. Joint &#8220;Anti-Terrorism Task Force&#8221; was behind the whole Kafaesque travesty of justice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marnie Tunay</title>
		<link>http://lawiscool.com/2009/06/15/more-on-abdelrazik/comment-page-1/#comment-5648</link>
		<dc:creator>Marnie Tunay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 05:46:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawiscool.com/?p=1662#comment-5648</guid>
		<description>They haven&#039;t denied him entry.  They&#039;ve just refused to give him a passport. He&#039;s welcome to come in - if he makes it to the border. 

And I&#039;ll have you know that it&#039;s a false rumour that Cannon denied entry to that noisy Scott, Gallagher. He merely advised him that he&#039;d better pack a sleeping bag and the name of a cheap motel on the south side of the border when he got there - just in case the border guard took it upon him/herself decided not to let him in.

You don&#039;t see a difference?  
They do.  
They are going to appeal. They don&#039;t want him here.  What do they have to lose by appealing?  It&#039;s our money, not theirs.
They know if they hold out long enough, - Abdelrazik won&#039;t be around for the punchline.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They haven&#8217;t denied him entry.  They&#8217;ve just refused to give him a passport. He&#8217;s welcome to come in &#8211; if he makes it to the border. </p>
<p>And I&#8217;ll have you know that it&#8217;s a false rumour that Cannon denied entry to that noisy Scott, Gallagher. He merely advised him that he&#8217;d better pack a sleeping bag and the name of a cheap motel on the south side of the border when he got there &#8211; just in case the border guard took it upon him/herself decided not to let him in.</p>
<p>You don&#8217;t see a difference?<br />
They do.<br />
They are going to appeal. They don&#8217;t want him here.  What do they have to lose by appealing?  It&#8217;s our money, not theirs.<br />
They know if they hold out long enough, &#8211; Abdelrazik won&#8217;t be around for the punchline.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KC</title>
		<link>http://lawiscool.com/2009/06/15/more-on-abdelrazik/comment-page-1/#comment-5644</link>
		<dc:creator>KC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 19:51:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawiscool.com/?p=1662#comment-5644</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t know what the government would appeal on in this case.  It is a pretty clear s. 6 violation.   They could possibly appeal the remedy I guess (i.e. bringing him home), but denying him entry is a pretty clear Charter violation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know what the government would appeal on in this case.  It is a pretty clear s. 6 violation.   They could possibly appeal the remedy I guess (i.e. bringing him home), but denying him entry is a pretty clear Charter violation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marnie Tunay</title>
		<link>http://lawiscool.com/2009/06/15/more-on-abdelrazik/comment-page-1/#comment-5638</link>
		<dc:creator>Marnie Tunay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 07:03:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawiscool.com/?p=1662#comment-5638</guid>
		<description>Sorry. There won&#039;t be a change.  The Harper govt will appeal - just as it has with the Feds&#039;s order to request the repatriation of Omar Khadr.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry. There won&#8217;t be a change.  The Harper govt will appeal &#8211; just as it has with the Feds&#8217;s order to request the repatriation of Omar Khadr.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

