Juhani’s Law
By: Law is Cool · May 16, 2009 · Filed Under Humour · 4 Comments
Juhani’s Law:
The compromise will always be more expensive than either of the suggestions it is compromising.
Comments
4 Responses to “Juhani’s Law”
Leave a Reply
Disclaimer
The contents of this site are intended for educational purposes only.
We encourage anyone in a situation requiring legal advice to seek professional consultation from an accredited lawyer recognized by the bar society in their jurisdiction of practice.
Law Is Cool is an open forum for ideas, intended to stimulate discussion. The views expressed in posts and comments are those of the individual contributor and may not be reflective of the views of other authors or readers.
Podcast Feeds
Pages
-
Latest Posts
- The Insanity Defence
- Achieving Your Goals in Law School
- Wikileaks considered a “threat” by US Army
- Could lawyers provide material support to terrorist organizations?
- Who falls for e-mail scams?
- Government Ignores “Tough on Crime” Statistics
- If school kills creativity, what about law school?
- Loophole in Olympic Rulebook
- OPP Officer Murdered, Tragic Irony…
-
Latest Comments
- John on Former NHL’er Ramage Has Appeal
- Omar Ha-Redeye on Could lawyers provide material support to terrorist organizations?
- Wayne Garden on Motor Vehicle Lemon Laws in Canada
- Marc on Could lawyers provide material support to terrorist organizations?
- Mendy White on Wikileaks considered a “threat” by US Army
- brian on How lawyers think
- R. McFarland on Motor Vehicle Lemon Laws in Canada
- Jamie Burgess on Iacobucci to Investigate on Detainee Documents
- Dixie on Want Some Free Legal Advice?
- Ryan MacIsaac on How to avoid committing sexual assault
Post Categories
- Aboriginal Law
- Administrative
- Administrative Law
- ADR/Mediation
- Bankrupcy & Insolvency
- Blogroll
- Civil Procedure
- Civil Rights
- Class Action
- Constitutional Law
- Construction Law
- Contracts
- Corporate Law
- Criminal Law
- Diversity in Law
- Entertainment Law
- Environmental Law
- Ethics
- Evidence
- Family Law
- Health Law
- Humour
- Immigration Law
- Intellectual Property
- International Law
- Labour & Employment Law
- Law Career
- Law Foundations
- Law School
- Legal Reform
- Legal Research
- Marketing/PR in Law
- Media Law
- Podcasts
- Politics
- Pop Culture
- Privacy
- Privacy Law
- Pro Bono
- Property
- Regulatory Law
- Reviews
- Securities Law
- Tax Law
- Technology
- Torts
- Trusts/Estates
- Uncategorized
Aboriginal Law
Administrative Law
Class Action Suits
Constitutional Law & Civil Rights
Corporate Law
Criminal Law
Environmental Law
Family Law
Firms
- Back of Envelope blog
- BC Business Law Blog
- BC LawLINE
- bob tarantino
- Canada Immigration
- Canada Immigration Blog
- Canadian Immigration Blawg
- Canadian Privacy Law Blog
- Canadian Securities Law Online
- Canadian Trademark Blog
- Cavanaagh Williams
- Daniel A. Lublin
- Daniel Lublin
- EXCESS COPYRIGHT
- GenereuxLaw
- Hoyes Michalos and Associates
- Injury Law Blog.com
- Law of the Land
- Municipal, Planning & Environmental Law Group Blog
- Now, Why Didn’t I Think of That?
- Osler Audio Reports
- Real Lawyers Have Blogs
- Renewable Energy & Sustainable Development Group Blog
- Robinson Sheppard Shapiro
- Rule of Law
- Schenk & Associates
- Strictly Legal
- Thoughts from a Management Lawyer
- Toronto Estate Law Blog
- Venture Law Lines
Fun & Entertainment
Health Law
Immigration Law
Intellectual Property
- Atlanteknology
- Bag and Baggage
- Canadian Trademark Blog
- Chaire en droit de la sécurité et des affaires électroniques
- CopyrightWatch.ca
- e legal
- EXCESS COPYRIGHT
- GenereuxLaw
- IP Osgoode
- Life Science Law
- Michael Geist’s Blog
- Now, Why Didn’t I Think of That?
- Rob Hyndman
- Slaw
- techblawg
- The Intellectual Property Law Blog
- Video Game Law Blog
International Law
Labour & Employment Law
Labour Law
Law Marketing/PR
Law News
Law School
- Ablawg.ca
- Chaire en droit de la sécurité et des affaires électroniques
- Constantinos Ragas
- Emadi St. Pierre
- Law Enforcement Accountability Project (LEAP)
- Law, Eh? Canadian Law School
- lawstudents.ca
- Legal and Literary Society
- Legal Intellects
- Lisa Hutch – The Trials
- Michael Geist’s Blog
- Michelle’s World
- Motion to Recess
- Non Traditional Law Student
- Outlines
- Privity: Just between You and Me
- The Court
- Trials and Tribulations
- TwistLaw.com
- UBC Law Library Blog
- University of Toronto Law School Faculty Blog
Legal Research
- Ballad in Plain E
- British Columbia Courthouse Library Society
- Connie Crosby
- CultureLibre.ca (French)
- Law21
- Library Boy
- LibTech Life
- Right and Remedies
- Shaunna Mireau on Canadian Legal Research
- Slaw
- Thoughtful Legal Management
- TwistLaw.com
- UBC Law Library Blog
- Vancouver Law Librarian Blog
- Wines and Information Management (WIM) (French)
Personal Injury Law
Podcasts
Politics
Property & Estate Law
Securities Law
Student Blogs
Archives
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
Awards
Partners
- Advertise Here
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
The Whiners - The Elusive Fish Creative Services
- Mesothelioma Lawyer
- no win no fee solicitors
- Compensation Claims
- personal injury lawyer toronto
- no win no fee
- Pardons Canada Accident Claim Medical Negligence Whiplash Claim
- No win No fee Claims
- Venue
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-

RSS Feed









…which is only really a concern if expense is your primary measure of success. It’s more expensive to have a trial, for example, than simply have the police determine guilt and punishment. Trials are a compromise between individual and state power. Would anyone reasonably say that the added expense of a trial is undesirable?
Incidentally, I don’t know if I think Despair’s definition of compromise is actually compromise. I’d say that what’s described would be more accurately called “tolerance”.
I would seriously question the validity of the proposition that a trial may be termed “a compromise” between individual and state power.
A compromise is the meeting of two opposing points of view in a give and take that is not in essence adversarial – unlike a trial, which is in essence adversarial and which may very well not involve any giving up of position on one of the sides at all.
Well, a trial isn’t a compromise between the parties in the trial, but the existence of trials is a compromise between different concepts of justice. Some might prefer that the police be all-powerful; others would prefer that disputes were settled privately.
It seems to me that Juhani’s Law is somewhat pejorative of compromise. The implication is that the greater expense associated with compromises is undesirable, and it would be better to select one of the two suggestions, rather than incur the additional expense of trying to make both parties happy.
The informing principles of modern, advanced democracies embody a great deal of expensive compromise, and I think a commitment to democratic principles necessarily entails the additional effort and expense that comes along with that. Juhani’s Law may be true, but it may be a bad idea to apply it in a lot of situations.
There is also the question of what sort of “expenses” will be taken into the balancing of accounts.