Why You Should Never Talk to the Police
Moin A. Yahya, Associate Professor of Law at U. Alberta has posted a couple of interesting videos on why criminal suspects should never talk to the police.
Most experienced defence lawyers will tell you that the first words out of their mouth when they get the 3AM phone call from the jail are: “don’t say anything!”
But for some reason, criminally accused often don’t seem to get it.
The videos feature a professor of law (formerly a defence lawyer) as well as a police officer explaining why suspects would do well to heed the advice and exercise their right to remain silent.
Though the videos are reflective of American law, the principles are largely applicable here in Canada. Though we do not have a 5th Amendment, Canadians have long had a right to silence which is now constitutionally entrenched in s. 7 of the Charter (see R. v. Singh, 2007 SCC 48 for a discussion).
And now, without further ado, here is why you ought not to speak to the police:
If you have limited time, I’d suggest skipping forward to 8:20, where the professor discusses the “top 10 reasons why you should never speak to the police.”
[YouTube clips reposted from U. Alberta's Law Faculty Blog]
Comments
25 Responses to “Why You Should Never Talk to the Police”
Leave a Reply
Disclaimer
The contents of this site are intended for educational purposes only.
We encourage anyone in a situation requiring legal advice to seek professional consultation from an accredited lawyer recognized by the bar society in their jurisdiction of practice.
Law Is Cool is an open forum for ideas, intended to stimulate discussion. The views expressed in posts and comments are those of the individual contributor and may not be reflective of the views of other authors or readers.
Podcast Feeds
Pages
-
Latest Posts
- The Insanity Defence
- Achieving Your Goals in Law School
- Wikileaks considered a “threat” by US Army
- Could lawyers provide material support to terrorist organizations?
- Who falls for e-mail scams?
- Government Ignores “Tough on Crime” Statistics
- If school kills creativity, what about law school?
- Loophole in Olympic Rulebook
- OPP Officer Murdered, Tragic Irony…
-
Latest Comments
- John on Former NHL’er Ramage Has Appeal
- Omar Ha-Redeye on Could lawyers provide material support to terrorist organizations?
- Wayne Garden on Motor Vehicle Lemon Laws in Canada
- Marc on Could lawyers provide material support to terrorist organizations?
- Mendy White on Wikileaks considered a “threat” by US Army
- brian on How lawyers think
- R. McFarland on Motor Vehicle Lemon Laws in Canada
- Jamie Burgess on Iacobucci to Investigate on Detainee Documents
- Dixie on Want Some Free Legal Advice?
- Ryan MacIsaac on How to avoid committing sexual assault
Post Categories
- Aboriginal Law
- Administrative
- Administrative Law
- ADR/Mediation
- Bankrupcy & Insolvency
- Blogroll
- Civil Procedure
- Civil Rights
- Class Action
- Constitutional Law
- Construction Law
- Contracts
- Corporate Law
- Criminal Law
- Diversity in Law
- Entertainment Law
- Environmental Law
- Ethics
- Evidence
- Family Law
- Health Law
- Humour
- Immigration Law
- Intellectual Property
- International Law
- Labour & Employment Law
- Law Career
- Law Foundations
- Law School
- Legal Reform
- Legal Research
- Marketing/PR in Law
- Media Law
- Podcasts
- Politics
- Pop Culture
- Privacy
- Privacy Law
- Pro Bono
- Property
- Regulatory Law
- Reviews
- Securities Law
- Tax Law
- Technology
- Torts
- Trusts/Estates
- Uncategorized
Aboriginal Law
Administrative Law
Class Action Suits
Constitutional Law & Civil Rights
Corporate Law
Criminal Law
Environmental Law
Family Law
Firms
- Back of Envelope blog
- BC Business Law Blog
- BC LawLINE
- bob tarantino
- Canada Immigration
- Canada Immigration Blog
- Canadian Immigration Blawg
- Canadian Privacy Law Blog
- Canadian Securities Law Online
- Canadian Trademark Blog
- Cavanaagh Williams
- Daniel A. Lublin
- Daniel Lublin
- EXCESS COPYRIGHT
- GenereuxLaw
- Hoyes Michalos and Associates
- Injury Law Blog.com
- Law of the Land
- Municipal, Planning & Environmental Law Group Blog
- Now, Why Didn’t I Think of That?
- Osler Audio Reports
- Real Lawyers Have Blogs
- Renewable Energy & Sustainable Development Group Blog
- Robinson Sheppard Shapiro
- Rule of Law
- Schenk & Associates
- Strictly Legal
- Thoughts from a Management Lawyer
- Toronto Estate Law Blog
- Venture Law Lines
Fun & Entertainment
Health Law
Immigration Law
Intellectual Property
- Atlanteknology
- Bag and Baggage
- Canadian Trademark Blog
- Chaire en droit de la sécurité et des affaires électroniques
- CopyrightWatch.ca
- e legal
- EXCESS COPYRIGHT
- GenereuxLaw
- IP Osgoode
- Life Science Law
- Michael Geist’s Blog
- Now, Why Didn’t I Think of That?
- Rob Hyndman
- Slaw
- techblawg
- The Intellectual Property Law Blog
- Video Game Law Blog
International Law
Labour & Employment Law
Labour Law
Law Marketing/PR
Law News
Law School
- Ablawg.ca
- Chaire en droit de la sécurité et des affaires électroniques
- Constantinos Ragas
- Emadi St. Pierre
- Law Enforcement Accountability Project (LEAP)
- Law, Eh? Canadian Law School
- lawstudents.ca
- Legal and Literary Society
- Legal Intellects
- Lisa Hutch – The Trials
- Michael Geist’s Blog
- Michelle’s World
- Motion to Recess
- Non Traditional Law Student
- Outlines
- Privity: Just between You and Me
- The Court
- Trials and Tribulations
- TwistLaw.com
- UBC Law Library Blog
- University of Toronto Law School Faculty Blog
Legal Research
- Ballad in Plain E
- British Columbia Courthouse Library Society
- Connie Crosby
- CultureLibre.ca (French)
- Law21
- Library Boy
- LibTech Life
- Right and Remedies
- Shaunna Mireau on Canadian Legal Research
- Slaw
- Thoughtful Legal Management
- TwistLaw.com
- UBC Law Library Blog
- Vancouver Law Librarian Blog
- Wines and Information Management (WIM) (French)
Personal Injury Law
Podcasts
Politics
Property & Estate Law
Securities Law
Student Blogs
Archives
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
Awards
Partners
- Advertise Here
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
The Whiners - The Elusive Fish Creative Services
- Mesothelioma Lawyer
- no win no fee solicitors
- Compensation Claims
- personal injury lawyer toronto
- no win no fee
- Pardons Canada Accident Claim Medical Negligence Whiplash Claim
- No win No fee Claims
- Venue
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-

RSS Feed








Really interesting – thanks for posting these.
While the jurisprudence is a little bit different north of the border, these videos are a great example of an enduring principle of Canadian criminal law. I cannot count how many times I have struggled to convince a new client NOT to go running off to the police station to engage in the folly of a ‘fireside chat’ with a local officer regarding charges he / she is facing.
The urge to comply with the ultimate authority figure in our lives (a police officer) is almost insurmountable. The reason to resist has at its core what I call the ‘asymaterical informational component’ of a police interview. The officer has a complete picture of the case he/she is building against the client whereas the client usually knows next to nothing (sometimes not even knowing the nature of the charge being investigated or whether he/she is even a suspect). The client also has no clue whether the conudct they have engaged in is even criminal or not. This truly a no-win situation. At best, a vigilant client blessed with a dose of good luck and a generous police interviewer can come to a draw with the investigator — but you’ll never win.
For a quick summary of what our firm advises our clients on this very question, check out our FAQ page at http://www.crimlawcanada.com/faq.html.
Ed Prutchi, Barrister
Adler Bytensky Prutschi
Prutschi@CrimLawCanada.com
http://www.CrimLawCanada.com
http://www.twitter.com/prutschi
This was great! Thanks so much for sharing.
You should change the headline to, “Why you should never talk to the Police….if You’re Guilty”
If no wrong doing has occurred, then what is the worry?
James:
Clearly you didn’t watch the videos. Go back and watch them.
Excellent video A serious subject treat with humour Should be part of every law schools workshop
Here’s a short case study of the techniques the detective in vid 2 talks about. This is from a sensational murder trial in Toronto where sentencing just concluded:
http://www.thestar.com/videozone/672886
Don’t talk to the police!
This outlines the very reason our system doesn’t work: people aren’t interested in the truth, they only want revenge.
Note, I didn’t say that people want justice. Justice is balanced compensation, which is never enough for anyone that’s been ‘wronged’. There’s a reason so many crazy laws exist. They’re not to prevent problems, but to provide as many means possible to extort as many people as possible.
People never, ever see each other as ‘innocent’.
[...] talk to the police. October 25th, 2009 | Tags: submitted by StealthCPA88 [link] [48 comments] Read Full Story from Reddit Politics. Leave a comment Related Posts & VideosNo [...]
[...] Law is Cool Tagged as: cops, police No Comments Comments (0) Trackbacks (0) ( subscribe to comments on [...]
Yup, NEVER cooperate with the cops for ANY reason. The oNLY thing you are require to do is give your name and D/O/B, thats it.
RT
http://www.anonymous.ua.tc
Do not talk to the police if you are a suspect or being interviewed as such. When the officer starts with questions regarding where you were or anything that generally starts pointing in your direction….that’s the time to shut up. Being a witness or questioned regarding what you may have seen is different.
The question that wasn’t answered is:
“What do you do when a police officer knocks on your door?”
I am probably wrong but isn’t a legal requirement to cooperate with a police investigation? Doesn’t cooperating involve talking to the police officer?
As the EXCELLENT VIDEO points out, it’s a “no win” situation – innocent or guilty.
Also big tip for Canadians: An “interview” is still an interrogation.
I’m not a law student but this was really interesting. I enjoyed watching this.
Whats interesting is when American senators and congressmen get in trouble, they exercise the 5th amendment immediately and refuse to testify.
They seem to know the law quite well.
The old saying “damned if you do, damned if you don’t” is very much alive in this topic.
Admittedly, I have not and will not watch the videos, as I am pretty sure I already know what they say.
As a former police officer I tried very hard to make people talk with me. Whether it was for them to confess to the crime, or simply to open up and tell me about the crime that they witnessed, or to tell me about the years of abuse that they have suffered.
If I happen to become a criminal defence lawyer, I will probably tell ONLY my clients to do the same.
Police officers are not scary boogie-men, who are out to get you.
Being a police officer is not centred around taking people to jail. While law enforcement is central to the position, police officers wear many more hats.
Having commentary from law professors to counsel people not to talk to the police does not do anybody any favours. Well unless you are in the back of a police car. But then again, once you are informed of your rights, and actually respond that you understand them, you are well enough informed that “what you say, can, and will be used against you in a court of law.”
Larry,
There are certain instances where you are required to cooperate with the police. Such as when you are pulled over as a driver.
In the end, if you are a suspect in a crime, or you THINK you are, you’re probably best not to say anything, because anything you say can be used against you.
[...] much of a trouble maker, despite what some of my previous employers might say, but after watching a pair of videos from the University of Alberta (watch them below or on the Law is Cool site), the only words I’m going to say to a police [...]
[...] Why You Should Never Talk to the Police. [...]
[...] You can find both of these videos embedded in the original post here. [...]
Yup, NEVER cooperate with the cops for ANY reason.
I totally agree with not talking to any cops. You never know what or how they will take and interpret what you say. It is all up in the air. I chose not to say anything.
As a Canadian I found the videos regarding not speaking to the police both interesting and instructive. One issue that was not addressed however is the following. If a police officer (a) phones you at your residence and leaves a message asking you to call them or (b) leaves their business card on your door with the same request is one required to comply. I would appreciate someone’s informed response to this issue. Thank-you.
J. Mardevic
Holy Christ that guy talks fast. Thanks for posting.
do you have to comply when police leave phone message or note requesting to talk? NO, NEVER you do not have to ever talk to police. The only requirement to talk is to give your name when asked out in public. NOTHING ELSE and you don’t have to answer the door either unless they have a warrant.