Chuck Norris’ Tears Don’t Cure Cancer
So he claims, in a lawsuit against book publisher Penguin.
Chuck Norris is suing the publisher for releasing a book called The Truth About Chuck Norris: 400 facts about the World’s Greatest Human.
The book contains numerous allegedly “mythical” facts about Chuck Norris which were collected from the internet. The facts include:
- “Chuck Norris’s tears cure cancer. Too bad he has never cried.”
- “When Chuck Norris does a push up, he isn’t lifting himself up, he’s pushing the Earth down.”
- “There is no theory of evolution. Just a list of creatures Chuck Norris has allowed to live.”
- “Chuck Norris is not afraid of the dark. The dark is afraid of Chuck Norris.”
The lawsuit alleges that the book resulted in trademark infringement, unjust enrichment and misappropriation of personality.
You will note that Chuck Norris is not suing for defamation. I suspect that’s because truth is a defence.
What I can’t understand is why Chuck Norris is bothering to sue. We all know that Chuck Norris doesn’t step on toes. Chuck Norris steps on necks.

Comments
7 Responses to “Chuck Norris’ Tears Don’t Cure Cancer”
Leave a Reply
Disclaimer
The contents of this site are intended for educational purposes only.
We encourage anyone in a situation requiring legal advice to seek professional consultation from an accredited lawyer recognized by the bar society in their jurisdiction of practice.
Law Is Cool is an open forum for ideas, intended to stimulate discussion. The views expressed in posts and comments are those of the individual contributor and may not be reflective of the views of other authors or readers.
Podcast Feeds
Pages
-
Latest Posts
- Student Prop for Harper is a High-Risk Vocation
- On grandmothers and stunt driving
- The Insanity Defence
- Achieving Your Goals in Law School
- Wikileaks considered a “threat” by US Army
- Could lawyers provide material support to terrorist organizations?
- Who falls for e-mail scams?
- Government Ignores “Tough on Crime” Statistics
- If school kills creativity, what about law school?
-
Latest Comments
- Lawrence Gridin on On grandmothers and stunt driving
- Ilia on On grandmothers and stunt driving
- Marc on On grandmothers and stunt driving
- Paul m on Student Prop for Harper is a High-Risk Vocation
- Doris Bartlett on Motor Vehicle Lemon Laws in Canada
- John on Former NHL’er Ramage Has Appeal
- Omar Ha-Redeye on Could lawyers provide material support to terrorist organizations?
- Wayne Garden on Motor Vehicle Lemon Laws in Canada
- Marc on Could lawyers provide material support to terrorist organizations?
- Mendy White on Wikileaks considered a “threat” by US Army
Post Categories
- Aboriginal Law
- Administrative
- Administrative Law
- ADR/Mediation
- Bankrupcy & Insolvency
- Blogroll
- Civil Procedure
- Civil Rights
- Class Action
- Constitutional Law
- Construction Law
- Contracts
- Corporate Law
- Criminal Law
- Diversity in Law
- Entertainment Law
- Environmental Law
- Ethics
- Evidence
- Family Law
- Health Law
- Humour
- Immigration Law
- Intellectual Property
- International Law
- Labour & Employment Law
- Law Career
- Law Foundations
- Law School
- Legal Reform
- Legal Research
- Marketing/PR in Law
- Media Law
- Podcasts
- Politics
- Pop Culture
- Privacy
- Privacy Law
- Pro Bono
- Property
- Regulatory Law
- Reviews
- Securities Law
- Tax Law
- Technology
- Torts
- Trusts/Estates
- Uncategorized
Aboriginal Law
Administrative Law
Class Action Suits
Constitutional Law & Civil Rights
Corporate Law
Criminal Law
Environmental Law
Family Law
Firms
- Back of Envelope blog
- BC Business Law Blog
- BC LawLINE
- bob tarantino
- Canada Immigration
- Canada Immigration Blog
- Canadian Immigration Blawg
- Canadian Privacy Law Blog
- Canadian Securities Law Online
- Canadian Trademark Blog
- Cavanaagh Williams
- Daniel A. Lublin
- Daniel Lublin
- EXCESS COPYRIGHT
- GenereuxLaw
- Hoyes Michalos and Associates
- Injury Law Blog.com
- Law of the Land
- Municipal, Planning & Environmental Law Group Blog
- Now, Why Didn’t I Think of That?
- Osler Audio Reports
- Real Lawyers Have Blogs
- Renewable Energy & Sustainable Development Group Blog
- Robinson Sheppard Shapiro
- Rule of Law
- Schenk & Associates
- Strictly Legal
- Thoughts from a Management Lawyer
- Toronto Estate Law Blog
- Venture Law Lines
Fun & Entertainment
Health Law
Immigration Law
Intellectual Property
- Atlanteknology
- Bag and Baggage
- Canadian Trademark Blog
- Chaire en droit de la sécurité et des affaires électroniques
- CopyrightWatch.ca
- e legal
- EXCESS COPYRIGHT
- GenereuxLaw
- IP Osgoode
- Life Science Law
- Michael Geist’s Blog
- Now, Why Didn’t I Think of That?
- Rob Hyndman
- Slaw
- techblawg
- The Intellectual Property Law Blog
- Video Game Law Blog
International Law
Labour & Employment Law
Labour Law
Law Marketing/PR
Law News
Law School
- Ablawg.ca
- Chaire en droit de la sécurité et des affaires électroniques
- Constantinos Ragas
- Emadi St. Pierre
- Law Enforcement Accountability Project (LEAP)
- Law, Eh? Canadian Law School
- lawstudents.ca
- Legal and Literary Society
- Legal Intellects
- Lisa Hutch – The Trials
- Michael Geist’s Blog
- Michelle’s World
- Motion to Recess
- Non Traditional Law Student
- Outlines
- Privity: Just between You and Me
- The Court
- Trials and Tribulations
- TwistLaw.com
- UBC Law Library Blog
- University of Toronto Law School Faculty Blog
Legal Research
- Ballad in Plain E
- British Columbia Courthouse Library Society
- Connie Crosby
- CultureLibre.ca (French)
- Law21
- Library Boy
- LibTech Life
- Right and Remedies
- Shaunna Mireau on Canadian Legal Research
- Slaw
- Thoughtful Legal Management
- TwistLaw.com
- UBC Law Library Blog
- Vancouver Law Librarian Blog
- Wines and Information Management (WIM) (French)
Personal Injury Law
Podcasts
Politics
Property & Estate Law
Securities Law
Student Blogs
Archives
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
Awards
Partners
- Advertise Here
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
The Whiners - The Elusive Fish Creative Services
- Mesothelioma Lawyer
- no win no fee solicitors
- Compensation Claims
- personal injury lawyer toronto
- no win no fee
- Pardons Canada Accident Claim Medical Negligence Whiplash Claim
- No win No fee Claims
- Venue
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-

RSS Feed








One of the most important cases of our time.
Remember folks, every time you tell a Chuck Norris joke to send him a penny in royalties unless you want to be sued.
There is no ‘ctrl’ button on Chuck Norris’s computer. Chuck Norris is always in control.
I’m surprised he would seek recourse to the legal system, since the only jurisdiction Chuck Norris recognizes is Chuck Norris.
And the only legal remedy Chuck Norris recognizes is the roundhouse kick to the face!
Here’s another fact for the sequel: Chuck Norris takes himself waaay too seriously.
(And his lawyer may contact me via my web-site for an address to serve notice of a law-suit.)
This just in:
Chuck Norris’ lawyer also represented Guy ritchie in his divorce against Madonna. Madonna’s lawyer also represented her in divorce proceedings against Sean Penn. Sean Penn’s lawyer is also representing the actor to recover funds lost to Bernard Madoff, who also defrauded…
…Kevin Bacon.