<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Court: No Expectation of Privacy in our Online Identity</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lawiscool.com/2009/02/14/court-no-expectation-of-privacy-in-our-online-identity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lawiscool.com/2009/02/14/court-no-expectation-of-privacy-in-our-online-identity/?nucrss=1</link>
	<description>The law school blog and podcast from Canada</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 00:00:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Omar Ha-Redeye</title>
		<link>http://lawiscool.com/2009/02/14/court-no-expectation-of-privacy-in-our-online-identity/comment-page-1/#comment-4779</link>
		<dc:creator>Omar Ha-Redeye</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Feb 2009 00:52:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawiscool.com/?p=1346#comment-4779</guid>
		<description>Well, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.law.uwo.ca/News/Sept_08/Lerners_08.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;they &lt;/a&gt; seemed to think we did a good job too.

Keep an eye out for my post on unionized employee&#039;s right to privacy on &lt;a href=&quot;http://slaw.ca&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Slaw &lt;/a&gt;tomorrow.

This SCJ ruling only confirms what we&#039;ve been saying here.  Lawyers&#039; perception of privacy is illusory.  Learning the technology proactively and protecting your identity is probably a better strategy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, <a href="http://www.law.uwo.ca/News/Sept_08/Lerners_08.html" rel="nofollow">they </a> seemed to think we did a good job too.</p>
<p>Keep an eye out for my post on unionized employee&#8217;s right to privacy on <a href="http://slaw.ca" rel="nofollow">Slaw </a>tomorrow.</p>
<p>This SCJ ruling only confirms what we&#8217;ve been saying here.  Lawyers&#8217; perception of privacy is illusory.  Learning the technology proactively and protecting your identity is probably a better strategy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jacob Kaufman</title>
		<link>http://lawiscool.com/2009/02/14/court-no-expectation-of-privacy-in-our-online-identity/comment-page-1/#comment-4778</link>
		<dc:creator>Jacob Kaufman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Feb 2009 18:48:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawiscool.com/?p=1346#comment-4778</guid>
		<description>&quot;In a moot competition concerning s.8 of the Charter, Omar Ha-Redeye and I argued the exact same point on behalf of the Crown. (Ironically, Justice Leitch was one of the judges of our competition.)&quot;
Well, I guess you guys did too good a job.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;In a moot competition concerning s.8 of the Charter, Omar Ha-Redeye and I argued the exact same point on behalf of the Crown. (Ironically, Justice Leitch was one of the judges of our competition.)&#8221;<br />
Well, I guess you guys did too good a job.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

