<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Interview with the Author of &#8220;Life Without Lawyers&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lawiscool.com/2009/01/12/interview-with-the-author-of-life-without-lawyers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lawiscool.com/2009/01/12/interview-with-the-author-of-life-without-lawyers/?nucrss=1</link>
	<description>The law school blog and podcast from Canada</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 00:00:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lawrence Gridin</title>
		<link>http://lawiscool.com/2009/01/12/interview-with-the-author-of-life-without-lawyers/comment-page-1/#comment-4775</link>
		<dc:creator>Lawrence Gridin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Feb 2009 15:43:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawiscool.com/?p=1267#comment-4775</guid>
		<description>Marv: mental injury is real and can be just as &quot;painful&quot; as physical injury. In some circumstances, it will be recognized by the courts as compensable.

Also, the case was not based on breach of contract  but rather negligence.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Marv: mental injury is real and can be just as &#8220;painful&#8221; as physical injury. In some circumstances, it will be recognized by the courts as compensable.</p>
<p>Also, the case was not based on breach of contract  but rather negligence.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: marv</title>
		<link>http://lawiscool.com/2009/01/12/interview-with-the-author-of-life-without-lawyers/comment-page-1/#comment-4773</link>
		<dc:creator>marv</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Feb 2009 06:46:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawiscool.com/?p=1267#comment-4773</guid>
		<description>Finding a fly in a bottle of water may be a breach of contract, fine.  But what should be the level of compensation??  Kids eat goldfish,  babies crawl around on the floor / grass and put everything in their mouth.  Mental injury, Please get over it.  Does the client put a net over their face to prevent bugs from entering the mounth during sleep?  When out doors, Do they talk with their lips closed?  Do they carry sanitizer and clean utensils when eating at a restruant?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Finding a fly in a bottle of water may be a breach of contract, fine.  But what should be the level of compensation??  Kids eat goldfish,  babies crawl around on the floor / grass and put everything in their mouth.  Mental injury, Please get over it.  Does the client put a net over their face to prevent bugs from entering the mounth during sleep?  When out doors, Do they talk with their lips closed?  Do they carry sanitizer and clean utensils when eating at a restruant?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lawrence Gridin</title>
		<link>http://lawiscool.com/2009/01/12/interview-with-the-author-of-life-without-lawyers/comment-page-1/#comment-4731</link>
		<dc:creator>Lawrence Gridin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Feb 2009 17:38:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawiscool.com/?p=1267#comment-4731</guid>
		<description>Dear Mr. Mustapha:

First, thank you very much for writing in with your comments.

The quotation and the views expressed in the article are those of Philip K. Howard, the author of the book. He admitted that he did not know much about your case. It was a Canadian example of the types of things that he was talking about; cases that should have been resolved without so much delay and legal process.

I have my own personal opinions about your case. You can find them &lt;a href=&quot;http://lawiscool.com/2008/05/21/dead-fly-in-water-bottle-case-to-be-decided-by-supreme-court-tomorrow/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://lawiscool.com/2008/05/22/follow-up-scc-tosses-dead-fly-appeal/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Mr. Mustapha:</p>
<p>First, thank you very much for writing in with your comments.</p>
<p>The quotation and the views expressed in the article are those of Philip K. Howard, the author of the book. He admitted that he did not know much about your case. It was a Canadian example of the types of things that he was talking about; cases that should have been resolved without so much delay and legal process.</p>
<p>I have my own personal opinions about your case. You can find them <a href="http://lawiscool.com/2008/05/21/dead-fly-in-water-bottle-case-to-be-decided-by-supreme-court-tomorrow/" rel="nofollow">here</a> and <a href="http://lawiscool.com/2008/05/22/follow-up-scc-tosses-dead-fly-appeal/" rel="nofollow">here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WADDAH MUSTAPHA (MARTIN</title>
		<link>http://lawiscool.com/2009/01/12/interview-with-the-author-of-life-without-lawyers/comment-page-1/#comment-4714</link>
		<dc:creator>WADDAH MUSTAPHA (MARTIN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 21:30:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawiscool.com/?p=1267#comment-4714</guid>
		<description>shame on you to name me  “extortive plaintiff who thinks he can get a million dollars after finding a fly in the water” can pursue the claim for years, clogging up the system to the detriment of worthy plaintiffs that ought to get their just compensation.
you&#039;re feeding the same mistake as as the average ignorant person would.
my claim was proven in three level of court one of them as you know SUPREME COURT OF CANADA
stated : As the manufacturer of a consumable good, C owed M, the ultimate consumer of that good, a duty of care in supplying bottled water to him, and it breached the standard of care by providing M with contaminated water.  The requirement of personal injury, which includes serious and prolonged psychological injury, is also met:  M suffered a debilitating psychological injury which had a significant impact on his life.  C’s breach caused that injury in fact, 
 so right there withdraw your comment you have no ground what so ever to call me “extortive plaintiff&quot;
SHAME ON YOU........................
KINDEST REGARDS,
THE PLANTIFF IN THAT CASE.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>shame on you to name me  “extortive plaintiff who thinks he can get a million dollars after finding a fly in the water” can pursue the claim for years, clogging up the system to the detriment of worthy plaintiffs that ought to get their just compensation.<br />
you&#8217;re feeding the same mistake as as the average ignorant person would.<br />
my claim was proven in three level of court one of them as you know SUPREME COURT OF CANADA<br />
stated : As the manufacturer of a consumable good, C owed M, the ultimate consumer of that good, a duty of care in supplying bottled water to him, and it breached the standard of care by providing M with contaminated water.  The requirement of personal injury, which includes serious and prolonged psychological injury, is also met:  M suffered a debilitating psychological injury which had a significant impact on his life.  C’s breach caused that injury in fact,<br />
 so right there withdraw your comment you have no ground what so ever to call me “extortive plaintiff&#8221;<br />
SHAME ON YOU&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;<br />
KINDEST REGARDS,<br />
THE PLANTIFF IN THAT CASE.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Philip K. Howard, &#8220;Life Without Lawyers: Liberating Americans from Too Much Law&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://lawiscool.com/2009/01/12/interview-with-the-author-of-life-without-lawyers/comment-page-1/#comment-4593</link>
		<dc:creator>Philip K. Howard, &#8220;Life Without Lawyers: Liberating Americans from Too Much Law&#8221;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Jan 2009 04:24:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawiscool.com/?p=1267#comment-4593</guid>
		<description>[...] Canadian law student site Law Is Cool interviews Howard. And &#8212; equal time dept. &#8212; plaintiff&#8217;s lawyers Max Kennerly and Brooks Schuelke [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Canadian law student site Law Is Cool interviews Howard. And &#8212; equal time dept. &#8212; plaintiff&#8217;s lawyers Max Kennerly and Brooks Schuelke [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

