<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Professional Conduct and Free Speech concerns</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lawiscool.com/2008/12/05/professional-conduct-and-free-speech-concerns/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lawiscool.com/2008/12/05/professional-conduct-and-free-speech-concerns/?nucrss=1</link>
	<description>The law school blog and podcast from Canada</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 00:00:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lawrence Gridin</title>
		<link>http://lawiscool.com/2008/12/05/professional-conduct-and-free-speech-concerns/comment-page-1/#comment-4227</link>
		<dc:creator>Lawrence Gridin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 18:35:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawiscool.com/?p=1139#comment-4227</guid>
		<description>See &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.lsuc.on.ca/regulation/a/profconduct/rule3/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Ontario Rules of Professional Conduct, Rule 3.&lt;/A&gt; 

There are (binding) restrictions on advertising but they do not go very far.

They are also likely to change in the future. Rule 3.04(1)(c), for example, which deals with advertisement that compares rates to other lawyers/firms, is probably going to be repealed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>See <a href="http://www.lsuc.on.ca/regulation/a/profconduct/rule3/" rel="nofollow">Ontario Rules of Professional Conduct, Rule 3.</a> </p>
<p>There are (binding) restrictions on advertising but they do not go very far.</p>
<p>They are also likely to change in the future. Rule 3.04(1)(c), for example, which deals with advertisement that compares rates to other lawyers/firms, is probably going to be repealed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Professional Conduct and free speech concerns &#171; The Social Blog</title>
		<link>http://lawiscool.com/2008/12/05/professional-conduct-and-free-speech-concerns/comment-page-1/#comment-4224</link>
		<dc:creator>Professional Conduct and free speech concerns &#171; The Social Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 16:16:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawiscool.com/?p=1139#comment-4224</guid>
		<description>[...] Professional Conduct and free speech&#160;concerns Posted in Uncategorized by Aditya on December 5th, 2008   Omar asked me to write for the lawiscool.com , a blogsite where canadian students post about various legal issues. He did comment on my previous post on professionalism in law in India and I thought that post should do something with that then. Since I am allowed cros- posting, here is what I wrote; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Professional Conduct and free speech&nbsp;concerns Posted in Uncategorized by Aditya on December 5th, 2008   Omar asked me to write for the lawiscool.com , a blogsite where canadian students post about various legal issues. He did comment on my previous post on professionalism in law in India and I thought that post should do something with that then. Since I am allowed cros- posting, here is what I wrote; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

