Federal Election Strategic Voting Tool
With the federal election just two weeks away, many are still scrambling to decide which name they should tick off on the ballot.
A friend of mine turned me on to an interesting Google Maps mashup which allows you to enter your postal code and see an estimation of the latest poll results for your riding.
The tool is designed with strategic voting in mind.
It is a pro-environment leaning website, and the goal of the authors is to see the Liberals, NDP, Bloc, and Greens win the most seats in the house of commons. Therefore, the website makes recommendations about which of these three parties you should strategically vote for in a particular riding to shut the Conservatives out of a seat.
However, even if you are a Conservative voter, you may still be interested to see how your candidate is doing in the latest polls.
I highly recommend checking it out.
The website is Vote For Environment / Voter Pour l’Environnement.
Comments
2 Responses to “Federal Election Strategic Voting Tool”
Leave a Reply
-
Disclaimer
The contents of this site are intended for educational purposes only.
We encourage anyone in a situation requiring legal advice to seek professional consultation from an accredited lawyer recognized by the bar society in their jurisdiction of practice.
Law Is Cool is an open forum for ideas, intended to stimulate discussion. The views expressed in posts and comments are those of the individual contributor and may not be reflective of the views of other authors or readers.
Podcast Feeds
-
Pages
-
Latest Posts
- 7 Ways To Lose An Argument Before It’s Started
- CUPE 3903 Strike Update from Osgoode
- Why You Should Never Steal a 1L’s Laptop
- Law is Cool Podcast: Human Rights Commissions
- Building Careers in Health Law
- ABA Journal Survey on the Economy
- Early Release for Weight
- My Race to the Finish
- Batman, Turkey Sues Warner Bros.
-
Latest Comments
- EnviroBottles on Water Bottle Ban on the Horizon
- StudentHostage on Yet Another Strike at York University (and Osgoode Hall)?
- Krys Verrall on CUPE 3903 Strike Update from Osgoode
- Gustav Farraday on Yet Another Strike at York University (and Osgoode Hall)?
- Thomas Wisdom on The Privileged and the Impoverished: Now One and the Same?
- KC on Law is Cool Podcast: Human Rights Commissions
- Pearl on Law is Cool Podcast: Human Rights Commissions
- KC on Law is Cool Podcast: Human Rights Commissions
- watercooler » Don’t mess with First Year Law Students on Why You Should Never Steal a 1L’s Laptop
- KC on Law is Cool Podcast: Human Rights Commissions
Post Categories
- Aboriginal Law
- Administrative
- Administrative Law
- ADR/Mediation
- Bankrupcy & Insolvency
- Blogroll
- Civil Procedure
- Civil Rights
- Class Action
- Constitutional Law
- Construction Law
- Contracts
- Corporate Law
- Criminal Law
- Diversity in Law
- Employment Law
- Entertainment Law
- Environmental Law
- Ethics
- Evidence
- Family Law
- Health Law
- Humour
- Immigration Law
- Intellectual Property
- International Law
- Labour & Employment Law
- Law Career
- Law Foundations
- Law School
- Legal Reform
- Legal Research
- Marketing/PR in Law
- Media Law
- Podcasts
- Politics
- Pop Culture
- Privacy
- Privacy Law
- Pro Bono
- Property
- Regulatory Law
- Reviews
- Securities Law
- Technology
- Torts
- Trusts/Estates
- Uncategorized
Aboriginal Law
Administrative Law
Class Action Suits
Constitutional Law & Civil Rights
Corporate Law
Criminal Law
Environmental Law
Family Law
Firms
- Back of Envelope blog
- BC Business Law Blog
- BC LawLINE
- bob tarantino
- Canada Immigration
- Canada Immigration Blog
- Canadian Immigration Blawg
- Canadian Privacy Law Blog
- Canadian Securities Law Online
- Canadian Trademark Blog
- Cavanaagh Williams
- Daniel A. Lublin
- Daniel Lublin
- EXCESS COPYRIGHT
- GenereuxLaw
- Hoyes Michalos and Associates
- Injury Law Blog.com
- Law of the Land
- Municipal, Planning & Environmental Law Group Blog
- Now, Why Didn’t I Think of That?
- Osler Audio Reports
- Real Lawyers Have Blogs
- Renewable Energy & Sustainable Development Group Blog
- Robinson Sheppard Shapiro
- Rule of Law
- Schenk & Associates
- Strictly Legal
- Thoughts from a Management Lawyer
- Toronto Estate Law Blog
- Venture Law Lines
Fun & Entertainment
Health Law
Immigration Law
Intellectual Property
International Law
Labour & Employment Law
Labour Law
Law Marketing/PR
Law News
Law School
- Ablawg.ca
- Chaire en droit de la sécurité et des affaires électroniques
- Constantinos Ragas
- Emadi St. Pierre
- Law, Eh? Canadian Law School
- lawstudents.ca
- Legal and Literary Society
- Legal Intellects
- Lisa Hutch - The Trials
- Michael Geist’s Blog
- Michelle’s World
- Motion to Recess
- Non Traditional Law Student
- Privity: Just between You and Me
- The Court
- TwistLaw.com
- UBC Law Library Blog
- University of Toronto Law School Faculty Blog
Legal Research
- Ballad in Plain E
- British Columbia Courthouse Library Society
- Connie Crosby
- CultureLibre.ca (French)
- Law21
- Library Boy
- LibTech Life
- Shaunna Mireau on Canadian Legal Research
- Slaw
- Thoughtful Legal Management
- TwistLaw.com
- UBC Law Library Blog
- Vancouver Law Librarian Blog
- Wines and Information Management (WIM) (French)
Personal Injury Law
Podcasts
Politics
Property & Estate Law
Securities Law
Student Blogs
Archives

RSS Feed























You really should clarify that the riding polling numbers are not based on actual polls conducted in the riding. Rather, it’s an extrapolation of the national numbers. And a rather questionable one at that. Check out punditsguide.ca for an excellent post on the dangers of uncritical strategic voting.
Dear Miss Vicky:
According to the website:
So it is a mix between the 2006 results and the latest national poll results. This is the best they can do given that polls are not conducted riding by riding in Canada (it would be too expensive, probably).
There are some ridings where the editors of the website use some pretty fuzzy math to come up with the figures. But in the description, they do explain that the figures are “adjusted” to take account of certain factors, such as recent unpopularity of a candidate.
I have revised my post to indicate that the numbers they give are an “estimate.”