<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: SCC constitutionalizes diminished criminal responsibility for youths</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lawiscool.com/2008/05/16/scc-constitutionalizes-diminished-criminal-responsibility-for-youths/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lawiscool.com/2008/05/16/scc-constitutionalizes-diminished-criminal-responsibility-for-youths/?nucrss=1</link>
	<description>The law school blog and podcast from Canada</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 May 2012 13:10:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lawrence Gridin</title>
		<link>http://lawiscool.com/2008/05/16/scc-constitutionalizes-diminished-criminal-responsibility-for-youths/comment-page-1/#comment-1615</link>
		<dc:creator>Lawrence Gridin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2008 17:06:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawiscool.com/?p=435#comment-1615</guid>
		<description>Colby: You&#039;re right. It is more specific than how I presented it in my conclusion. Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Colby: You&#8217;re right. It is more specific than how I presented it in my conclusion. Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Colby Cosh</title>
		<link>http://lawiscool.com/2008/05/16/scc-constitutionalizes-diminished-criminal-responsibility-for-youths/comment-page-1/#comment-1612</link>
		<dc:creator>Colby Cosh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2008 06:57:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawiscool.com/?p=435#comment-1612</guid>
		<description>&quot;Whatever attempts the government makes in the near future to the YCJA, they will now have to be consistent with the notion that young people have diminished moral culpability.&quot;

It would be more accurate to say that future changes to the YCJA will now have to be consistent with the notion that young people are entitled to a presumption of diminished moral culpability. The dissenting justices aren&#039;t arguing against the general principle, just the onus.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Whatever attempts the government makes in the near future to the YCJA, they will now have to be consistent with the notion that young people have diminished moral culpability.&#8221;</p>
<p>It would be more accurate to say that future changes to the YCJA will now have to be consistent with the notion that young people are entitled to a presumption of diminished moral culpability. The dissenting justices aren&#8217;t arguing against the general principle, just the onus.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jen Hargrove</title>
		<link>http://lawiscool.com/2008/05/16/scc-constitutionalizes-diminished-criminal-responsibility-for-youths/comment-page-1/#comment-1611</link>
		<dc:creator>Jen Hargrove</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2008 02:31:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawiscool.com/?p=435#comment-1611</guid>
		<description>The term &quot;young persons&quot; is too vague. It will be twisted and bent in into a pretzel.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The term &#8220;young persons&#8221; is too vague. It will be twisted and bent in into a pretzel.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

