<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Lessons from Potential Blogging Libel Suit in Canada</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lawiscool.com/2008/02/28/first-potential-blogging-libel-suit-in-canada/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lawiscool.com/2008/02/28/first-potential-blogging-libel-suit-in-canada/?nucrss=1</link>
	<description>The law school blog and podcast from Canada</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 00:00:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: dailybayonet</title>
		<link>http://lawiscool.com/2008/02/28/first-potential-blogging-libel-suit-in-canada/comment-page-1/#comment-1006</link>
		<dc:creator>dailybayonet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 20:01:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawiscool.com/2008/02/28/first-potential-blogging-libel-suit-in-canada/#comment-1006</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m just taking advantage of your open comments to ask if you might have any news on the blog that the complainants against Maclean&#039;s were going to start?  If they wanted help with it, I know that Jay Currie has offered some.  Also, many interested bloggers would help them publicize it.  Thanks.

&lt;hr&gt;

LawIsCool:  We are not privy to such information, and have not heard anything recently.  We would suggest contacting the complainants themselves directly.  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m just taking advantage of your open comments to ask if you might have any news on the blog that the complainants against Maclean&#8217;s were going to start?  If they wanted help with it, I know that Jay Currie has offered some.  Also, many interested bloggers would help them publicize it.  Thanks.</p>
<hr />
<p>LawIsCool:  We are not privy to such information, and have not heard anything recently.  We would suggest contacting the complainants themselves directly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Romeo Montague</title>
		<link>http://lawiscool.com/2008/02/28/first-potential-blogging-libel-suit-in-canada/comment-page-1/#comment-1004</link>
		<dc:creator>Romeo Montague</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 16:51:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawiscool.com/2008/02/28/first-potential-blogging-libel-suit-in-canada/#comment-1004</guid>
		<description>Okay, a successful libel suit establishes that one can still successfully bring a suit against someone for libel.  I&#039;m not aware than anyone has suggested that libel is no longer actionable.  You&#039;ve knocked a straw man flat on its butt!
&lt;hr&gt;
LawIsCool:  Not a strawman; this is an educational site.  We often explore issues that are not contested simply for the sake of learning.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay, a successful libel suit establishes that one can still successfully bring a suit against someone for libel.  I&#8217;m not aware than anyone has suggested that libel is no longer actionable.  You&#8217;ve knocked a straw man flat on its butt!</p>
<hr />
LawIsCool:  Not a strawman; this is an educational site.  We often explore issues that are not contested simply for the sake of learning.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Progressive Bloggers</title>
		<link>http://lawiscool.com/2008/02/28/first-potential-blogging-libel-suit-in-canada/comment-page-1/#comment-1003</link>
		<dc:creator>Progressive Bloggers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 13:15:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawiscool.com/2008/02/28/first-potential-blogging-libel-suit-in-canada/#comment-1003</guid>
		<description>&lt;!--%kramer-ref-pre%--&gt;[...] [...]  Permalink / From Woman At Mile 0 / Feb 28, 02:45 EST / Related        3   votes         First Potential Blogging Libel Suit in Canada  Mark Evans, a former journalist for the National Post and technology blogger, reports on a new [...]&lt;!--%kramer-ref-post%--&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--%kramer-ref-pre%-->[...] [...]  Permalink / From Woman At Mile 0 / Feb 28, 02:45 EST / Related        3   votes         First Potential Blogging Libel Suit in Canada  Mark Evans, a former journalist for the National Post and technology blogger, reports on a new [...]<!--%kramer-ref-post%--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert McClelland</title>
		<link>http://lawiscool.com/2008/02/28/first-potential-blogging-libel-suit-in-canada/comment-page-1/#comment-1002</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert McClelland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 13:10:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawiscool.com/2008/02/28/first-potential-blogging-libel-suit-in-canada/#comment-1002</guid>
		<description>This is really old news. In fact, I believe the suit was settled.

&lt;hr&gt;

LawIsCool:  Thanks, and the post has been updated to reflect that.  A reader sent this in to us so we posted it and added the relevant s.1 aspects.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is really old news. In fact, I believe the suit was settled.</p>
<hr />
<p>LawIsCool:  Thanks, and the post has been updated to reflect that.  A reader sent this in to us so we posted it and added the relevant s.1 aspects.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

