<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Defending Liebeck v. McDonald&#8217;s</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lawiscool.com/2008/02/15/defending-liebeck-v-mcdonalds/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lawiscool.com/2008/02/15/defending-liebeck-v-mcdonalds/?nucrss=1</link>
	<description>The law school blog and podcast from Canada</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 00:00:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: FindLaw for Legal Professionals - Case Law, Federal and State Resources, Forms, and Code</title>
		<link>http://lawiscool.com/2008/02/15/defending-liebeck-v-mcdonalds/comment-page-1/#comment-1599</link>
		<dc:creator>FindLaw for Legal Professionals - Case Law, Federal and State Resources, Forms, and Code</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 20:18:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawiscool.com/2008/02/15/defending-liebeck-v-mcdonalds/#comment-1599</guid>
		<description>&lt;!--%kramer-ref-pre%--&gt;[...] sellers. ... http://www.corpreform.com/corpreform/2003/10/what_is_tort_re.html - Similar Pages  Law is Cool ? Defending Liebeck v. McDonald?s Even Seinfeld mocks the case, with Kramer?s lawyer reprimanding him for using a  balm that ... [...]&lt;!--%kramer-ref-post%--&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--%kramer-ref-pre%-->[...] sellers. &#8230; <a href="http://www.corpreform.com/corpreform/2003/10/what_is_tort_re.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.corpreform.com/corpreform/2003/10/what_is_tort_re.html</a> &#8211; Similar Pages  Law is Cool ? Defending Liebeck v. McDonald?s Even Seinfeld mocks the case, with Kramer?s lawyer reprimanding him for using a  balm that &#8230; [...]<!--%kramer-ref-post%--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

