<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Law is Stupid Too</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lawiscool.com/2008/01/14/law-is-stupid-too/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lawiscool.com/2008/01/14/law-is-stupid-too/?nucrss=1</link>
	<description>The law school blog and podcast from Canada</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 00:00:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick</title>
		<link>http://lawiscool.com/2008/01/14/law-is-stupid-too/comment-page-1/#comment-9379</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Aug 2010 10:09:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawiscool.com/2008/01/14/law-is-stupid-too/#comment-9379</guid>
		<description>I recently heard something about a law somewhere in Canada that if you see an indian sitting in a stagecoach, you&#039;re allowed to kill him. Only problem is, I&#039;m not able to find any info on that law anywhere. Can anyone tell me where this law is and if it&#039;s still active?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I recently heard something about a law somewhere in Canada that if you see an indian sitting in a stagecoach, you&#8217;re allowed to kill him. Only problem is, I&#8217;m not able to find any info on that law anywhere. Can anyone tell me where this law is and if it&#8217;s still active?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://lawiscool.com/2008/01/14/law-is-stupid-too/comment-page-1/#comment-7844</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Dec 2009 20:17:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawiscool.com/2008/01/14/law-is-stupid-too/#comment-7844</guid>
		<description>I can&#039;t remember where I read this and what place it is illeagal in but: In __________ it is illeagal to recieve anal sex, although you can still give it.

Okay so basicly you can have anal sex then call the cops on your partner for receiving anal sex?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t remember where I read this and what place it is illeagal in but: In __________ it is illeagal to recieve anal sex, although you can still give it.</p>
<p>Okay so basicly you can have anal sex then call the cops on your partner for receiving anal sex?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott</title>
		<link>http://lawiscool.com/2008/01/14/law-is-stupid-too/comment-page-1/#comment-5277</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 13:54:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawiscool.com/2008/01/14/law-is-stupid-too/#comment-5277</guid>
		<description>go
od place to read goofy laws,here&#039;s a couple more.
saskatchewan: it is illeagal for an obease woman to wear shorts while fishing.
It is illeagal in B.C. to fish from the back of an ugly horse.    thanks and keep on laughing</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>go<br />
od place to read goofy laws,here&#8217;s a couple more.<br />
saskatchewan: it is illeagal for an obease woman to wear shorts while fishing.<br />
It is illeagal in B.C. to fish from the back of an ugly horse.    thanks and keep on laughing</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: éric</title>
		<link>http://lawiscool.com/2008/01/14/law-is-stupid-too/comment-page-1/#comment-3660</link>
		<dc:creator>éric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Nov 2008 02:09:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawiscool.com/2008/01/14/law-is-stupid-too/#comment-3660</guid>
		<description>hi there,
Just to mention that Montreal is in Quebec, not in Ontario!!!

&lt;hr&gt;

Law is Cool:  We&#039;re obviously aware of the major city by that name in Quebec.  We&#039;ve quoted this from another site as indicated, and it&#039;s probably fair to assume there is a smaller township by that name within Ontario where this applies.
Unless of course this law is enacted in Quebec, in which case we would love to hear more about it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hi there,<br />
Just to mention that Montreal is in Quebec, not in Ontario!!!</p>
<hr />
<p>Law is Cool:  We&#8217;re obviously aware of the major city by that name in Quebec.  We&#8217;ve quoted this from another site as indicated, and it&#8217;s probably fair to assume there is a smaller township by that name within Ontario where this applies.<br />
Unless of course this law is enacted in Quebec, in which case we would love to hear more about it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean</title>
		<link>http://lawiscool.com/2008/01/14/law-is-stupid-too/comment-page-1/#comment-1452</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 May 2008 20:59:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawiscool.com/2008/01/14/law-is-stupid-too/#comment-1452</guid>
		<description>Yeah, I live in Kanata, and they do have the law against clothes lines. Although we are about to get rid of it because the city has finally realized that we can save electricity by using a line instead of the dryer. :P</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, I live in Kanata, and they do have the law against clothes lines. Although we are about to get rid of it because the city has finally realized that we can save electricity by using a line instead of the dryer. :P</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon V.D.</title>
		<link>http://lawiscool.com/2008/01/14/law-is-stupid-too/comment-page-1/#comment-608</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon V.D.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2008 11:53:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawiscool.com/2008/01/14/law-is-stupid-too/#comment-608</guid>
		<description>The current &lt;a href=&quot;laws.justice.gc.ca/en/charter/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Charter of Rights and Freedoms &lt;/a&gt;is stupid too.  Someone still has to decide what rights take priority whenever there is a conflict.  There are many conflicts.  And the supposed rights it proclaims include such obvious wrongs as advocacy of homosexuality.  Should the world continue, some future civilization will look back and point out the stupidity that is ending ours.

&lt;blockquote&gt;LawIsCool:  We respectfully disagree, and cherish the Charter as an essential and central piece of our constitution.  (Jon has &lt;a href=&quot;http://lawiscool.com/2008/01/12/maybe-they-wannabe-cool-too/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;previously&lt;/a&gt; commented in support of Mark Steyn in the tribunal case against Maclean&#039;s). &lt;/blockquote&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The current <a href="laws.justice.gc.ca/en/charter/" rel="nofollow">Charter of Rights and Freedoms </a>is stupid too.  Someone still has to decide what rights take priority whenever there is a conflict.  There are many conflicts.  And the supposed rights it proclaims include such obvious wrongs as advocacy of homosexuality.  Should the world continue, some future civilization will look back and point out the stupidity that is ending ours.</p>
<blockquote><p>LawIsCool:  We respectfully disagree, and cherish the Charter as an essential and central piece of our constitution.  (Jon has <a href="http://lawiscool.com/2008/01/12/maybe-they-wannabe-cool-too/" rel="nofollow">previously</a> commented in support of Mark Steyn in the tribunal case against Maclean&#8217;s). </p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

