<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Prevention of Genocide</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lawiscool.com/2007/10/10/prevention-of-genocide/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lawiscool.com/2007/10/10/prevention-of-genocide/?nucrss=1</link>
	<description>The law school blog and podcast from Canada</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 00:00:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: dinosaur</title>
		<link>http://lawiscool.com/2007/10/10/prevention-of-genocide/comment-page-1/#comment-1384</link>
		<dc:creator>dinosaur</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 21:18:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawiscool.com/international-conflicts/prevention-of-genocide/#comment-1384</guid>
		<description>Stop genocide end abortions.

3.5 million dead and counting.

&lt;hr&gt;

LawIsCool:  Whatever your position might be on abortion, the courts have ruled on its legality in &lt;a href=&quot;http://csc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/1988/1988rcs1-30/1988rcs1-30.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;R v. Morgentaler&lt;/a&gt;.
  

&lt;blockquote&gt;   The deprivation of the s. 7 right in this case offends freedom of conscience guaranteed in s. 2(a) of the Charter. The decision whether or not to terminate a pregnancy is essentially a moral decision and in a free and democratic society the conscience of the individual must be paramount to that of the state. Indeed, s. 2(a) makes it clear that this freedom belongs to each of us individually. &quot;Freedom of conscience and religion&quot; should be broadly construed to extend to conscien- tiously-held beliefs, whether grounded in religion or in a secular morality and the terms &quot;conscience&quot; and &quot;religion&quot; should not be treated as tautologous if capable of independent, although related, meaning. The state here is endorsing one conscientiously-held view at the expense of another. It is denying freedom of conscience to some, treating them as means to an end, depriving them of their &quot;essential humanity&quot;. &lt;/blockquote&gt;



To liken it to geocide is misleading and offensive.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stop genocide end abortions.</p>
<p>3.5 million dead and counting.</p>
<hr />
<p>LawIsCool:  Whatever your position might be on abortion, the courts have ruled on its legality in <a href="http://csc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/1988/1988rcs1-30/1988rcs1-30.html" rel="nofollow">R v. Morgentaler</a>.</p>
<blockquote><p>   The deprivation of the s. 7 right in this case offends freedom of conscience guaranteed in s. 2(a) of the Charter. The decision whether or not to terminate a pregnancy is essentially a moral decision and in a free and democratic society the conscience of the individual must be paramount to that of the state. Indeed, s. 2(a) makes it clear that this freedom belongs to each of us individually. &#8220;Freedom of conscience and religion&#8221; should be broadly construed to extend to conscien- tiously-held beliefs, whether grounded in religion or in a secular morality and the terms &#8220;conscience&#8221; and &#8220;religion&#8221; should not be treated as tautologous if capable of independent, although related, meaning. The state here is endorsing one conscientiously-held view at the expense of another. It is denying freedom of conscience to some, treating them as means to an end, depriving them of their &#8220;essential humanity&#8221;. </p></blockquote>
<p>To liken it to geocide is misleading and offensive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Law is Cool - Episode #7 (://URLFAN)</title>
		<link>http://lawiscool.com/2007/10/10/prevention-of-genocide/comment-page-1/#comment-782</link>
		<dc:creator>Law is Cool - Episode #7 (://URLFAN)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 11:06:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawiscool.com/international-conflicts/prevention-of-genocide/#comment-782</guid>
		<description>&lt;!--%kramer-ref-pre%--&gt;[...] Omar talks about the CLawBie Award, and Marie Winfield’s focus on Global Conference on the Prevention of Genocide in [...]&lt;!--%kramer-ref-post%--&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--%kramer-ref-pre%-->[...] Omar talks about the CLawBie Award, and Marie Winfield’s focus on Global Conference on the Prevention of Genocide in [...]<!--%kramer-ref-post%--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

